Cosmology in an accelerated universe: observations and phenomenology

En las últimas décadas la cosmología ha experimentado notables avances como consecuencia del desarrollo de nuevos experimentos que nos han abastecido con precisos datos observacionales. La calidad de estos datos ha permitido construir una imagen global del universo actual; un universo acelerado compuesto principalmente por materia oscura (23%) distinta a la materia ordinaria (5%), y energía oscura (70%), la componente del universo que contrarresta el efecto gravitatorio y explica la expansión acelerada de éste. Con la existencia de estas dos principales componentes se puede explicar la situación actual del universo y los fenómenos que tienen lugar en él. Sin embargo, su naturaleza es todavía un misterio, por lo que nos encontramos ante un largo y apasionante camino que recorrer.Es en este contexto donde se enmarca el trabajo presentado en esta tesis, cuyo principal objetivo es ir más allá y obtener algunas pistas nuevas sobre la naturaleza de la energía oscura. Las investigaciones llevadas a cabo durante esta tesis tratan de hacer frente a este sector ¿oscuro" desde varias perspectivas, combinando la teoría y el análisis de datos astronómicos.Como primer acercamiento, en el capítulo 2 se propone un nuevo modelo para unificar el sector ¿oscuro¿: materia y energía oscura. En los capítulos 3 y 4 se aborda el problema de la energía oscura desde una nueva perspectiva y se presentan unas nuevas parametrizaciones de la ecuación de estado de la energía oscura. Por último, en el capítulo 5, a través de los datos del fondo cósmico de microondas, se da un paso más allá en física de las épocas tempranas del universo, y se obtienen restricciones sobre el exceso de densidad de radiación observado. Por otra parte, se da una explicación a este fenómeno: se atribuye este exceso al fondo cósmico de ondas gravitacionales primordiales producido por las cuerdas cósmicas, bajo condiciones adiabáticas.

Métodos cuantitativos versus métodos cualitativos en la economía de los Negocios. ¿Es una metodología reconciliable?

Changes in the organizational environment over the last three decades have increasingly led to traditional theories being called into question, by stimulating the search for new models suited to the new realities of business economics, generating a crisis or scientific revolution that may result in the appearance of a new paradigm. The positivism-phenomenology duality provokes an “epistemological crisis” in research in management sciences. But the existence of both approaches does not imply the election of one scientific orientation in frontal opposition to the other. From these two conceptions of research procedure, the methods applied can be classed into groups, quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative methodologies places great confidence in the ability of data and measurement to represent opinions or concepts, while qualitative methodologies focus on words and relations to describe a reality or situation. While the diversity of methods contribute to its development and indicates the maturity of an area, the methods must be suitably implemented to obtain significant, valid results. The methodology to be used is not going to depend solely on the type of study or the reality under examination, but also on the stage the research process has reached.

A genealogical map of the concept of habit

The notion of information processing has dominated the study of the mind for over six decades. However, before the advent of cognitivism, one of the most prominent theoretical ideas was that of Habit. This is a concept with a rich and complex history, which is again starting to awaken interest, following recent embodied, enactive critiques of computationalist frameworks. We offer here a very brief history of the concept of habit in the form of a genealogical network-map. This serves to provide an overview of the richness of this notion and as a guide for further re-appraisal. We identify 77 thinkers and their influences, and group them into seven schools of thought. Two major trends can be distinguished. One is the associationist trend, starting with the work of Locke and Hume, developed by Hartley, Bain, and Mill to be later absorbed into behaviorism through pioneering animal psychologists (Morgan and Thorndike). This tradition conceived of habits atomistically and as automatisms (a conception later debunked by cognitivism). Another historical trend we have called organicism inherits the legacy of Aristotle and develops along German idealism, French spiritualism, pragmatism, and phenomenology. It feeds into the work of continental psychologists in the early 20th century, influencing important figures such as Merleau-Ponty, Piaget, and Gibson. But it has not yet been taken up by mainstream cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Habits, in this tradition, are seen as ecological, self-organizing structures that relate to a web of predispositions and plastic dependencies both in the agent and in the environment. In addition, they are not conceptualized in opposition to rational, volitional processes, but as transversing a continuum from reflective to embodied intentionality. These are properties that make habit a particularly attractive idea for embodied, enactive perspectives, which can now re-evaluate it in light of dynamical systems theory and complexity research.

The activity view of inner speech

We distinguish two general approaches to inner speech (IS) the "format" and the "activity" views and defend the activity view. The format view grounds the utility of IS on features of the representational format of language, and is related to the thesis that the proper function of IS is to make conscious thinking possible. IS appears typically as a product constituted by representations of phonological features. The view also has implications for the idea that passivity phenomena in cognition may be misat-tributed IS. The activity view sees IS as a speaking activity that does not have a proper function in cognition. It simply inherits the array of functions of outer speech. We argue that it is methodologically advisable to start from this variety of uses, which suggests commonalities between internal and external activities. The format view has several problems; it has to deny "unsymbolized thinking"; it cannot easily explain how IS makes thoughts available to consciousness, and it cannot explain those uses of IS where its format features apparently play no role. The activity view not only lacks these problems but also has explanatory advantages: construing IS as an activity allows it to be integrally constituted by its content; the view is able to construe unsymbolized thinking as part of a continuum of phenomena that exploit the same mechanisms, and it offers a simple explanation for the variety of uses of IS