Clinical factors associated with a Candida albicans Germ Tube Antibody positive test in Intensive Care Unit patients

Background: Poor outcomes of invasive candidiasis (IC) are associated with the difficulty in establishing the microbiological diagnosis at an early stage. New scores and laboratory tests have been developed in order to make an early therapeutic intervention in an attempt to reduce the high mortality associated with invasive fungal infections. Candida albicans IFA IgG has been recently commercialized for germ tube antibody detection (CAGTA). This test provides a rapid and simple diagnosis of IC (84.4% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity). The aim of this study is to identify the patients who could be benefited by the use of CAGTA test in critical care setting. Methods: A prospective, cohort, observational multicentre study was carried out in six medical/surgical Intensive care units (ICU) of tertiary-care Spanish hospitals. Candida albicans Germ Tube Antibody test was performed twice a week if predetermined risk factors were present, and serologically demonstrated candidiasis was considered if the testing serum dilution was >= 1: 160 in at least one sample and no other microbiological evidence of invasive candidiasis was found. Results: Fifty-three critically ill non-neutropenic patients (37.7% post surgery) were included. Twenty-two patients (41.5%) had CAGTA-positive results, none of them with positive blood culture for Candida. Neither corrected colonization index nor antifungal treatment had influence on CAGTA results. This finding could corroborate that the CAGTA may be an important biomarker to distinguish between colonization and infection in these patients. The presence of acute renal failure at the beginning of the study was more frequent in CAGTA-negative patients. Previous surgery was statistically more frequent in CAGTA-positive patients. Conclusions: This study identified previous surgery as the principal clinical factor associated with CAGTA-positive results and emphasises the utility of this promising technique, which was not influenced by high Candida colonization or antifungal treatment. Our results suggest that detection of CAGTA may be important for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in surgical patients admitted in ICU.

PICC vs Catéter central insertado en vena subclavia en pacientes críticos

[Es]Introducción: actualmente, en servicios como UCIs, quirófanos y Urgencias cada vez es más común el empleo de CVCS y PICC. Ambos están asociados a graves complicaciones como CLABSI, TVP, EP, arritmia, etc. Dado que la enfermería juega un papel importante tanto en la inserción de estos dispositivos, como en el mantenimiento y prevención de las adversidades, es necesario poseer los conocimientos y habilidades adecuados para su afrontamiento. Objetivo y metodología: determinar cuál de los dos supone menor riesgo de complicaciones en pacientes críticos mediante la evidencia científica y utilizando la EBE. Para ello se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica de estudios encontrados en bases de datos como Pubmed, Cochrane y Cinhal mediante la combinación de términos MeSH y palabras clave con operadores booleanos. Resultados y discusión: se han incluido en total 13 publicaciones (6 RS, 4 estudios de cohorte, 1 ECA y 2 GPC), de las cuales 3 poseen calidad alta, 3 media y 5 baja. Tanto los PICC como los CVCS implican diversas complicaciones, divididas en infecciosas, trombo-embolicas y mecánicas/otras. Existe insuficiente evidencia científica y gran heterogeneidad entre los artículos, lo que dificulta su extrapolación. Conclusiones: en pacientes críticos los PICC poseen mayor riesgo de TVP, los CVCS de complicaciones mecánicas, y ambos presentan tasas similares de CLABSI. Es importante escoger de forma individualizada el catéter a implantar, estimando los riesgos-beneficios de cada uno. Los cuidados preventivos son fundamentales en la reducción de estas contingencias. Son necesarios más estudios prospectivos comparativos.