From social to political. New forms of mobilization and democratization. Conference proceedings

In the recent evolution of contemporary social movements three phases can be identified. The first phase is marked by the labour movement and the systemic importance attributed to the labour conflict in industrial societies. This conflict has been interpreted as a consequence of the shortcoming of social integration mechanisms by Emile Durkheim, as a rational conflict by entrepreneurs’ and workers’ interests by Max Wener, and as a central class struggle for the transformation of society by Karl Marx. The second phase in this development was led by the new social movements of the post-industrial society of the 1960s and 1970s’ students, women and environmentalist movements. Two new analytical perspectives have explained these movements’ meaning and actions. Resource mobilization theory (McAdam and Tilly) has focuses on rational attitudes and conflicts. Actionalist sociology, in turn, has identified the new protagonists of social conflicts that replaced the labour movement in postindustrial societies. The third phase emerges in a world characterized by the ascendance of markets, the increasingly prominent role of financial capital flows, the closure of communities, and fundamentalism. In this context, human rights and pro-democratization movements constitute alternatives to global domination and the systemic conditioning of individual and groups.

Spinal circuits can accommodate interaction torques during multijoint limb movements

The dynamic interaction of limb segments during movements that involve multiple joints creates torques in one joint due to motion about another. Evidence shows that such interaction torques are taken into account during the planning or control of movement in humans. Two alternative hypotheses could explain the compensation of these dynamic torques. One involves the use of internal models to centrally compute predicted interaction torques and their explicit compensation through anticipatory adjustment of descending motor commands. The alternative, based on the equilibrium-point hypothesis, claims that descending signals can be simple and related to the desired movement kinematics only, while spinal feedback mechanisms are responsible for the appropriate creation and coordination of dynamic muscle forces. Partial supporting evidence exists in each case. However, until now no model has explicitly shown, in the case of the second hypothesis, whether peripheral feedback is really sufficient on its own for coordinating the motion of several joints while at the same time accommodating intersegmental interaction torques. Here we propose a minimal computational model to examine this question. Using a biomechanics simulation of a two-joint arm controlled by spinal neural circuitry, we show for the first time that it is indeed possible for the neuromusculoskeletal system to transform simple descending control signals into muscle activation patterns that accommodate interaction forces depending on their direction and magnitude. This is achieved without the aid of any central predictive signal. Even though the model makes various simplifications and abstractions compared to the complexities involved in the control of human arm movements, the finding lends plausibility to the hypothesis that some multijoint movements can in principle be controlled even in the absence of internal models of intersegmental dynamics or learned compensatory motor signals.

Uso pertinente del collarín cervical en el paciente traumático: una revisión sistemática.

Introducción y objetivo: El collarín cervical es un dispositivo que tiene como objetivo disminuir el movimiento del cuello para evitar lesiones secundarias en el manejo del paciente traumático en el ámbito prehospitalario. Mediante la realización de esta revisión sistemática se ha pretendido evaluar si la colocación del collarín cervical disminuye la movilidad del cuello en el paciente traumático, así como determinar si puede producir o evitar lesiones durante su manejo. Metodología: Revisión sistemática en base a las disposiciones PRISMA. Se elaboró un protocolo de búsqueda que se utilizó en cuatro bases de datos (Medline, Scopus, CINAHL y Web of Science) y se incluyeron ensayos clínicos y estudios observacionales publicados entre enero de 1995 y diciembre de 2014. Resultados: La revisión se realizó a partir de 10 ensayos clínicos no aleatorizados de modesta calidad metodológica: en 6 se utilizaron cadáveres con lesión cervical y en los otros 4 voluntarios sanos sin lesión cervical y un ensayo clínico aleatorizado de muestra pequeña realizado sobre cadáveres con lesión cervical. En los estudios realizados en pacientes sanos sin lesión cervical se observó que el collarín disminuía de forma significativa la movilidad del cuello frente a la no inmovilización. Por el contrario, en los estudios en los que participaban cadáveres con lesión cervical se determinó que el collarín cervical no disminuía la movilidad del cuello. Además en tres estudios se detectó un aumento de la separación intervertebral y en uno, un aumento de la presión venosa yugular. Conclusiones: Si bien la inmovilización cervical reduce la movilidad del cuello en pacientes sin lesión, este efecto no se produce en quienes presentan lesiones cervicales.