Activaciones patrimoniales e iniciativas museísticas: ¿por quién? y ¿para qué?

[ES] Se suele afirmar que hay dos tipos de patrimonio cultural. Uno, “eterno”, “riguroso”, “irremplazable” o “global”; otro, “contingente”, “flexible”; “sustituible” o “local”. El primero es de la “humanidad”; el segundo, de la “comunidad”. Los trabajos que se presentan en esta publicación, describen y analizan procesos de activación de ese segundo tipo de patrimonio: los intereses y las valorizaciones que han conducido a la patrimonialización o puesta en valor de unos bienes culturales; qué agentes han intervenido en ese proceso; por qué, para qué y cómo lo han llevado a cabo. Se interesan más por el modus operandi que por el opus operatum. Escritos por profesores, investigadores, especialistas y técnicos, los trabajos de esta publicación presentan un conjunto de experiencias europeas y americanas, mostrando un panorama diverso y complejo del campo patrimonial y museístico, así como distintas aproximaciones en función de la posición que ocupa el autor respecto a los bienes culturales.

Demand for Cultural Heritage

Prepared for the Handbook of the Economics of Cultural Heritage. Forthcoming in Edgard Elgar Publisher. Anna Mignosa and Ilde Rizzo (editors)

Life Expectancy, Schooling Time and Endogenous Growth

Published as an article in: Economic Inquiry, 2004, vol. 42, issue 4, pp. 602–617.

Ancient DNA from South-East Europe Reveals Different Events during Early and Middle Neolithic Influencing the European Genetic Heritage

The importance of the process of Neolithization for the genetic make-up of European populations has been hotly debated, with shifting hypotheses from a demic diffusion (DD) to a cultural diffusion (CD) model. In this regard, ancient DNA data from the Balkan Peninsula, which is an important source of information to assess the process of Neolithization in Europe, is however missing. In the present study we show genetic information on ancient populations of the South-East of Europe. We assessed mtDNA from ten sites from the current territory of Romania, spanning a time-period from the Early Neolithic to the Late Bronze Age. mtDNA data from Early Neolithic farmers of the Starcevo Cris culture in Romania (Carcea, Gura Baciului and Negrilesti sites), confirm their genetic relationship with those of the LBK culture (Linienbandkeramik Kultur) in Central Europe, and they show little genetic continuity with modern European populations. On the other hand, populations of the Middle-Late Neolithic (Boian, Zau and Gumelnita cultures), supposedly a second wave of Neolithic migration from Anatolia, had a much stronger effect on the genetic heritage of the European populations. In contrast, we find a smaller contribution of Late Bronze Age migrations to the genetic composition of Europeans. Based on these findings, we propose that permeation of mtDNA lineages from a second wave of Middle-Late Neolithic migration from North-West Anatolia into the Balkan Peninsula and Central Europe represent an important contribution to the genetic shift between Early and Late Neolithic populations in Europe, and consequently to the genetic make-up of modern European populations.