Utilità e limiti della diagnosi di patologie polmonari e pleuriche asbesto-correlate

L’apparato respiratorio rappresenta il bersaglio di numerose sostanze tossiche aerodisperse che rivestono un ruolo chiave nella patogenesi della maggior parte delle patologie polmonari e pleuriche, sia benigne che maligne. Nonostante per alcune di esse siano noti specifici fattori di rischio, le sole attività di prevenzione primaria non sono sufficienti a limitarne la diffusione. Si rende quindi necessario attuare adeguate misure di prevenzione secondaria per la diagnosi di malattie potenzialmente curabili allo stadio iniziale, in modo da aumentare l’efficacia dei trattamenti terapeutici e le possibilità di guarigione. Un approccio non invasivo per lo studio dei meccanismi fisiopatologici alla base delle patologie polmonari e pleuriche potrebbe essere effettuato anche con nuove metodiche (es. naso elettronico), al fine di identificare e validare nuovi biomarcatori per un più specifico approccio diagnostico. Il lavoro scientifico ha riguardato inizialmente l’identificazione di un indicatore o di un gruppo di indicatori dotati di potere diagnostico sufficientemente elevato per poter discriminare precocemente, nell’ambito di soggetti con pregressa esposizone ad asbesto, patologie benigne, sia polmonari che pleuriche, da patologie maligne. Successivamente l’attenzione è stata rivolta alla diagnosi precoce di patologie neoplastiche a carico del solo parenchima polmonare, valutando il potere discriminante di un pattern di composti organici volatili (VOCs, tra cui pentano, 2-metilpentano, esano, etilbenzene, eptanale e trans-2-nonenale) raccolti con metodiche non invasive e dotati di potere diagnostico tale da discriminare patologie benigne da patologie maligne potenzialmente curabili in soggetti ad alto rischio di sviluppare cancro del polmone. Infine abbiamo tentato di ottimizzare i parametri di impostazione e raccolta di un nuovo strumento: il naso elettronico. Su di esso esistono alcuni lavori in letteratura in cui ne vengono descritte le potenzialità in ambito diagnostico per il riconoscimento di specifici pattern suggestivi di patologie polmonari, sia flogistiche (TBC, BPCO) che neoplastiche (mesotelioma, NSCLC). Purtroppo nessuno di questi lavori definisce le condizioni ottimali di utilizzo, i limiti dello strumento e le interferenze di fattori ambientali e soggettivi riguardo al segnale elaborato. Il lavoro si è concentrato soprattutto sull’indagine delle condizioni ottimali di utilizzo e sull’eventuale condizionamento del segnale da parte di determinate variabili ambientali (es. umidità) o individuali (es. fumo, cibo, alcol).

Asma, abitudini e stile di vita "Analisi retrospettiva di un campione di pazienti asmatici seguito in ambulatorio di terzo livello"

Growing evidence suggest the importance of different environments in promoting the pathogenesis and/or exacerbation of asthma. Indoor air pollution is a major contributor to human exposure, since people spend up to 90% of their day indoors. Apart from active smoking, indoor pollution is considered one of the major preventable risk factors of chronic respiratory diseases. The professional activity can also be dangerous because it exposes the subject to environments that can promote the onset of asthma or worsening of the latter in those already affected. Even bad habits such as incorrect diet, lead to more difficulty in controlling their disease. However asthma is a multifactorial disease in nature so it is not easy to distinguish the role of occupational exposure, pollution and normal habits such as smoking, nutrition, sports, etc. This retrospective study was conducted on a sample of asthma patients residing in the metropolitan area of Parma. 116 patients were selected among those who are followed up at least two years at the Asthma outpatient Clinic of Parma University Hospital. The sample in question is therefore closely controlled and monitored; it comes to patients who are well educated on the control of their disease, are able to take appropriate measures to minimize the symptomatology. With this tight approach is proposed to minimize the effect of confounding and then traced with greater certainty the possible cause of the failure to control the disease. For this purpose, each patient was subjected to regular checkups; we took as a reference the period of time between April and October 2015. During each visit, in addition to general data for each patient, we were collected personal information about their habits and way of life through a validated questionnaire delivered and completed by the patient during the visit in the presence of the permanent staff. The questionnaire covers mainly the qualification of the patient, its possible occupational exposure, his home, with information about nearby traffic, time spent outside, physical activity (place and time), exposure to chemicals, exposure to various fumes (fireplace or stove) and cigarette smoke, comorbidities and any drugs taken during the visits considered. Regarding the respiratory conditions of patients during every examination we were considered: Asthma Control Test (a test performed by patients to assess the state of the disease during the month preceding the test), the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) as an index of airways inflammation, measuring the resistance level of small airways (R5-R20) and some spirometric values observed in experiment; in particular the forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV 1), FEV1/FVC ratio, forced expiratory flow rate over the middle 50% of the FVC (FEF25–75) and FEF25-75/FVC were recorded. The sample has been studied considering both the changes of the respiratory parameters for every patient in their examinations, and the respiratory parameters of all the examinations took as a whole in relation with the variables considered. From the results obtained, the patients are clinically stable; their adopted lifestyle and the exposure to possible sources of outdoor pollution, seems not affect the overall control of their disease. Some findings of our study are of interest. First, the subjects who carry a steroid therapy show a clinical worst, as revealed by the decrease of most spirometric indices, particularly FEF25, FEF75, FEF25-75 and R5-R20; also, the presence of comorbidities and the subsequent intake of other drugs, in addition to normal therapy for asthma, seem to be conditions associated with poorer performance in the functional respiratory parameters in particular FEV1/FVC, FEF75 and FEF25-75. Spirometric indexes that are down are mainly those related to obstruction imposed on small airways; this suggests a neglect to the latter on the contrary should be further explored and treated accordingly. It is also observed that both patients are overweight than those living on the lower floors and/or who have the most windows exposed to traffic, showed a decrease of pulmonary function, especially those relate to an obstruction at the small airways level. In conclusion, our results provided the evidence that a most appropriate therapy, specific to reach the small airways, associated with a healthy lifestyle, can help improve the management of asthma.