48 resultados para qualité de la notation
Resumo:
Afin de vérifier sur un site régional la présence d'une qualité d'eau de mer permettant la réalisation d'élevages larvaires d'huîtres creuses Crassostrea gigas (et/ou d'huîtres plates Ostrea edulis) sur une base régulière tout au long de l'année, une série d'élevages comparatifs a été réalisée à la Station IFREMER de Palavas, de mars 1995 à septembre 1995. Le matériel biologique nécessaire à cette comparaison est constitué de larves d'huîtres creuses Crassostrea gigas et en algues unicellulaires provenant de l'éc1oserie commerciale de la SATMAR. Les résultats obtenus démontrent la capacité de l'eau de mer du site étudié sur Leucate à supporter la production de larves d'huîtres creuses compétentes à se métamorphoser et à se fixer. Cette étude s'inscrit dans la démarche de la Région Languedoc-Roussillon et du CEPRALMAR visant à favoriser l'implantation d'une écloserie de production de Mollusques Bivalves sur le littoral méditerranéen.
Resumo:
The Water Framework Directive uses the “One-out, all-out” (OAOO) principle in assessing water bodies (i.e. the worst status of the elements used in the assessment determines the final status of the water body). Combination of multiple parameters within a biological quality element (BQEs) can be done in different ways. This study analysed several aggregation conditions within the BQE "Flora other than phytoplankton" (intertidal macroalgae, subtidal macroalgae, eelgrass beds and opportunistic blooms) using monitoring data collected along the Channel and Atlantic coastline. Four aggregation criteria were tested on two sets of data collected between 2004 and 2014: OOAO, average, intermediate method between OOAO and average and a method taking into account an uncertainty value at the threshold "Good/Moderate." Based on available data, the intermediate method appears the most qualified method using first an averaging approach between the natural habitat elements and then applying the OAOO between this mean and the opportunistic blooms, characteristic of an eutrophic environment. Expert judment might be used to ensure in the overall interpretation of results at waterbody level and in the classification outcomes.
Resumo:
Dietary studies of marine species constitute an important key to improve the understanding of its biology and of its role in the ecosystem. Thus, prey-predator relationships structure and determine population dynamics and the trophic network at the ecosystem scale. Among the major study sites, the marine ecosystem is submitted to natural and anthropogenic constraints. In the North-Eastern part of the Atlantic Ocean, the Bay of Biscay is a large open area surrounded South by Spain and East by France. This bay is an historic place of intense fishery activities for which the main small pelagic species targeted are the pilchard, Sardina pilchardus and the anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus. The aim of this work is to analyze the trophic ecology of these two small pelagic fish in spring in the Bay of Biscay. To do this, a first section is devoted to their prey composed by the mesozooplanktonic compartment, through a two-fold approach: the characterization of their spatio-temporal dynamics during the decade 2003-2013 and the measurement of their energetic content in spring. For this season, it appears that all prey types are not worth energetically and that the Bay of Biscay represents a mosaic of dietary habitat. Moreover, the spring mesozooplankton community presents a strong spatial structuration, a temporal evolution marked by a major change in abundance and a control by the microphytoplankton biomass. The second section of this work is relative to a methodological approach of the trophic ecology of S. pilchardus and E. encrasicolus. Three different trophic tracers have been used: isotopic ratios of carbon and nitrogen, parasitological fauna and mercury contamination levels. To improve the use of the first of these trophic tracers, an experimental approach has been conducted with S. pilchardus to determine a trophic discrimination factor. Finally, it appears that the use of these three trophic tracers has always been permitted to highlight a temporal variability of the relative trophic ecology of these fish. However, no spatial dynamics could be identified through these three trophic tracers.