PICES Press, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2001

The state of PICES science – 2000 [pp. 1-2] [pdf, 0.6 Mb] The state of the western North Pacific in the first half of 2000 [pp. 3-5] [pdf, 0.7 Mb] The status of the Bering Sea: January – August 2000 [pp. 6-7] [pdf, 0.3 Mb] The state of the eastern North Pacific since spring 2000 [pp. 8-9] [pdf, 0.4 Mb] Makoto Kashiwai [pp. 10-14] [pdf, 0.9 Mb] Alkalinity measurement quality improves for PICES nations [pp. 15-16] [pdf, 0.4 Mb] Dr. Timothy R. Parsons Awarded 2001 Japan Prize [p. 17] [pdf, 0.2 Mb] Highlights of the PICES Nineth Annual Meeting [pp. 18-19] [pdf, 0.4 Mb] Tangible outline of the whole elephant (Results of ecosystem studies of biological resources in the far-eastern seas in 1990s) [pp. 20-24] [pdf, 0.7 Mb] The Oshoro Maru: A short history of Hokkaido University's workhorse in the North Pacific [pp. 25-28] [pdf, 0.4 Mb] Bering Sea and North Pacific Ocean Theme Page [pp. 29-30] [pdf, 0.3 Mb] PICES IX Japan/East Sea cruise [pp. 31-34] [pdf, 1.1 Mb] 35 PICES Wooster Award [p. 35] [pdf, 0.2 Mb] PICES Intern Program [p. 35] [pdf, 0.2 Mb] Obituary - Prof. Michael M. Mulin [p. 36] [pdf, 0.2 Mb]

The role of specially designated wildlife sites in freshwater conservation - an English perspective

The value of specially designated sites in conserving biodiversity has been a hotly debated issue for many years. The debate has recently been given fresh impetus by the creation of Natural England, the new Government Agency responsible for the protection and enhancement of the natural environment in England, and the challenges facing the management of designated sites resulting from the increasingly tangible effects of climate change. In the freshwater environment, the role of designated sites is very much under the spotlight because of the implementation of the European 'Water Framework' Directive, which aspires to holistic, ecologically-based management of aquatic habitats.This paper explores the underlying premises of, and rationale for, special site designations for wildlife, and provides a frank account of the inevitable clash of management philosophies that designated sites create in the freshwater environment, drawing on experiences of managing designated freshwater sites in England over the past decade. A positive role is outlined for designated sites in freshwater conservation, which addresses these management conflicts in a way that not only meets Government obligations towards these sites but also paves the way for enlightened, progressive management of the wider freshwater resource. As part of this account, attempts are made to clarify the relationship between key biodiversity-related policy drivers in the freshwater environment, and to explain how the spectre of climate change can be addressed within designated site management. The importance of strategic freshwater science, collaboratively designed and funded, in maximising the value of the designated freshwater site network to the wider freshwater habitat resource, is stressed.

Weighing your options: how to protect your property from shoreline erosion, a handbook for estuarine property owners in North Carolina

If you own property on one of North Carolina’s estuaries, you can use this guide as a tool to learn about the choices you have to control your shoreline erosion and help decide which approach may be right for you. In North Carolina, we make a distinction between waterfront property that is located on the estuary, referred to as estuarine, shoreline, soundfront or riverside property, and waterfront property located directly on the ocean, referred to as oceanfront. Why? State laws and regulations addressing estuarine and oceanfront property, and the available erosion control methods, are quite different. This guide focuses on estuarine property. We’ll introduce you to the six main erosion control options in use in North Carolina and give you information about the out-of-pocket costs and tangible benefits of each option. We’ll also give you information about “hidden” costs and benefits that you may want to factor into your decision-making. You are fortunate to have a piece of estuarine shoreline to call your own, whether it’s your year-round residence or a weekend getaway. And if you’ve noticed some shoreline erosion lately, you’re probably a little concerned. But there are ready solutions.

Utilization of the fish waste self-brine of fish curing industry as farm fertilizer

Large quantities of self-brine accumulating in curing tanks during the process of commercial fish salting is mostly wasted at present. This liquor exuded from the fish during the process of salting contains considerable amounts of soluble proteins and minerals. Due to the presence of organic matter the self-brine quickly putrefies causing nauseating smell. This renders the whole surroundings insanitary and often leads to health hazards to neighboring localities. Any economic method of utilising this waste brine and converting it into some useful product will be a tangible help to the fish curing industry. Hence, a method is given for converting this waste self-brine into a cheap and efficient fertilizer.