Nueva lista de las aves de la provincia de Buenos Aires.

El presente trabajo aporta información de base para el seguimiento y evaluación de la biodiversidad de las aves a escala local o regional. Para la realización de la lista, hemos tenido como punto de referencia la Lista sistemática de las aves de la provincia de Buenos Aires de N. Bó y C. Darrieu 1991 y Las aves de la provincia de Buenos Aires: distribución y estatus de T. Narosky y A. Di Giácomo 1993. La presente enumeración considera todas las especies de aves que habitan la provincia de Buenos Aires, es decir aquellas que nidifican o que pasan gran parte del año en la misma. Se excluyen, por lo tanto, aquellas especies accidentales y ocasionales. Los datos se basan en citas bibliográficas recientes, material de colección y observaciones de campo realizadas por los autores. Para indicar la distribución geográfica de las aves se ha seguido el esquema propuesto por Ringuelet y Arámburu (1957, Enumeración sistemática de los Vertebrados de la Provincia de Buenos Aires). Según el mismo se divide a la provincia en cuatro áreas: la 1 posee una avifauna de tipo subtropical; en la 2 se encuentran aves pampeanas con ingresión de especies de la Provincia Chaqueña (Distrito Occidental); en la 4 la avifauna presenta un gran número de especies que llegan por el sur desde la Provincia del Monte (Distrito Meridional) y de la Provincia Patagónica (Distrito Occidental); el área 3 es de transición con aporte de especies de las otras zonas. La presente lista comprende los nombres científicos tomados de Altman & Swift (1989), Checklist of the Birds of South America. Para los nombres vulgares se siguió a Navas et al (1991). Lista Patrón de Nombres Comunes de las Aves Argentinas. Se incluye además una lista de las especies exóticas naturalizadas. (Text is in Spanish.

The impact of varying nutrient regimes in earthen freshwater ponds on the comparative ecology of diurnally occurring candidate live feeds

The daytime composition and relative abundance of zooplankton species were studied in three treatments of two replicate earthen ponds each with nutrient sources and water replenishment regimes. Treatment -A (200m super(2) surface area supplied 900kgha super(-1) pig manure only). Treatment -B (200m super(2) surface area supplied 70kgha super(-1) month super(-1) pig manure, 50kgha super(-1) month super(-1) N.P.K. [15:15:15] and 30kgha super(-1) month super(-1) Urea) and Treatment-C (1500m2 surface area supplied 1150kgha super(-1) month super(-1) commercial grade 40% crude protein compounded feed). Water replenishment for Treatment A was daily tidal deluge from the New Calabar River while that for treatment B and C was from column-well and occasional rains. No zooplankton species were recovered from the pig-manure only treatment (A) while only Diffugia constricta and Difflugia urceolata were the two protozoans that occurred together in treatments B (combined fertilization) and C (compounded feed only) in contrast, Difflugia acuminate and three rotifers, Collurella uncinata, Diurella stylata and Keratella quadrata occurred only treatment B. similarly, Arcella arenaria, Arcella costata, Centropyxis aculeate, Difflugia pyriformis, Branchionus calyciflorus, Lepadella patella, Polyarthra trigla and Onchocanmptus mohammedi were recovered from treatment C. Arcella costata was the most abundant zooplankton in the entire experiment, while Arcella arenaria was very abundant in treatment C, Collurella uncinata was very abundant in treatment B. The inference is that combined fertilization of earthen freshwater ponds tend to be more suitable for the culture of rotifers such as Brachionus calyciflorus, popular in fish larva nursery, while those supplied compounded feed could be used to produce protozoans where desirable

Effect of brood source on the growth of rohu (Labeo rohita Ham.) fingerlings reared in glass tanks with formulated diets

A 60 day long feeding trial was conducted in an indoor static water system with rohu fingerlings (Labeo rohita Ham.) originating from wild brood, private and public hatcheries (denoted as A B and C respectively). They were fed on formulated diet having 34% crude protein level using indigenous ingredients. The effect of brood source on growth as well as their responses to formulated diet was observed. On the basis of the observed growth rate, food conversion ratio, protein efficiency ratio, apparent net protein utilization and apparent protein digestibility, fingerling source A showed significantly (p<0.05) higher growth, while the sources B and C produced no significantly different (p>0.05) in terms of these parameters. The results of the present study demonstrated that the fingerlings of wild source were of best quality in terms of growth and food utilization in comparison to those had the sources from hatcheries.

Hatching and rearing of gourami, (Osphronemus goramy, Lacepede) in the Polonnaruwa nursery

Gourami have been maintained as spawners in the ponds of the Fisheries Station at Polonnaruwa since 1957, for the production of fingerlings needed for the stocking of the inland waters. The procedure adopted for the rearing of these fingerlings (see Ling 1962, Indrasena, and de Silva, 1964, for details) is briefly descripted.