1 resultado para Driving attitude
em Aquatic Commons
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (15)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (31)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (77)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (19)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (36)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (7)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (15)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (26)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (334)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (24)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (5)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (21)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Michigan (148)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (28)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Relevância:
Resumo:
An attitude scale was constructed to measure the attitude of fisherwomen towards improved fish processing methods. To construct the attitude scale, 'scale' and ‘Q’ values (the interquartile ranges) were calculated for 31 statements selected, based on the opinion of 34 judges. Based on the 'scale' and ‘Q’ values 16 statements were selected with eight favorable statements and eight unfavorable statements. The weightages given were 3, 2 and 1 for favorable statements and 1, 2 and 3 for unfavorable statements.