1 resultado para Coalition
em Aquatic Commons
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (6)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (6)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (36)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (27)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (8)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (20)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (11)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (7)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (56)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (13)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (11)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (9)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (13)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (33)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (53)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (16)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (31)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (33)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (9)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Université de Montréal (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (35)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
The goal of the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project (PSNERP) is to improve system-wide functionality of nearshorei ecosystem processes. To achieve that goal, PSNERP plans to strategically restore nearshore sites throughout Puget Sound. PSNERP scientists are assessing changes to the nearshore, and will recommend an environmentally strategic restoration portfolio. Yet, PSNERP also needs stakeholder input to design a socially strategic portfolio. This research investigates the values and preferences of stakeholders in the Whidbey Sub-Basin of Puget Sound to help PSNERP be both socially and environmentally strategic. This investigation may be repeated in the six other Puget Sound Sub-Basins. The results will guide restoration portfolio design and future stakeholder involvement activities. This study examines four areas of stakeholder values and preferences: 1) beliefs about the causes, solutions, and severity of nearshore problems; 2) priorities for nearshore features, shoreforms, developments, and restoration objectives; 3) thoughts about ecosystem servicesiii and trade-offs among them; and 4) visions of a future, restored Puget Sound nearshore and the role of science in attaining this vision. The study is framed by two hypotheses from the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), which suggests that groups of policy advocates form around shared “policy core beliefs” which can transcend traditional categories of stakeholders.(PDF contains 3 pages)