Toxigenic molds on fish feeds-1: impact of climatic change

The present communication is a survey report carried out to assess the incidence of toxic mycoflora on seven types of agriculture products/by products incorporated during fish culture as supplementary dietary items. Samples were obtained from various sources at Darbhanga, Madhubani and Samashtipur districts during summer, winter and monsoon months. Out of the total 1774 samples, only 894 appeared to be fresh visually reflecting average incidence of contamination around 46.6%. However, the apparently fresh samples, when subjected to culture, 26.9% of them were found to be contaminated. Thus, degree of fungal spoilage in feed ingredients in parts of north Bihar appears to be significantly high (73.5%). The present study illustrates the facts with special reference to Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus (elaborating aflatoxins) A. ochraceous, Penicilium viradicatuin (elaborating ochratoxins) and A. versicolor (elaborating sterigmatocystin). The other strains already known for their toxigenic potentials that appeared on the present substrates included A. niger, A. fumigatus, A. candidus, P. islandicum, Rhizopus spp. and Mucur spp. Studies indicate that the prevalent climatic factors like temperature and relative humidity facilitate a congenial condition almost all through the year and in particular during summer and monsoon months. But water content of the substrates is a vital factor that further accelerates the pace of mycobial spoilage. A thorough sun-drying of the agricultural commodities before prolonged storage to bring water content below the "low risk limit" may significantly reduce the incidence of molds.

Perspectives of impacts of international fish trade in Kenya

There has been tremendous growth in international trade on fish and fisheries products in the last four decades. In 1970 the value of internationally traded fish was estimated at 3 billion; this increased to US$ 15 billion in 1980, US$ 36 billion in 1990 and US$ 55 billion in 2000 (Ahmed, 2003). Recent statistics show that fish trade has surpassed other agricultural commodities that have traditionally been traded internationally such as coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, cereals, meat, oils and milk. In 2000, fish contributed 22% of the value of all agricultural exports, making it the highest internationally traded food product (Ahmed, 2003). In another perspective, nearly 40% of the world's fish is now sold in the international market. The flow of fish in the international market is highly lopsided. About 50% of fish exportscomefromthedevelopingworld ,ofwhich 20%arefrom low-incomefood deficient countries. Most of this fish, however, is consumed by the developed countries, which account for nearly 80% of all imported fish. The EU, USA and Japan are the major importers, accounting for over 77% of global fish imports. Thus, while developing countries playa big role in fish production , they consume very little of it, instead preferring to sell for the hard currency. In some fish exporting countries, especially those in Asia, there is some link between fish exports and imports of substitute and complementary foods. Much of the increased earning from fish exports in those countries is explained by a corresponding rise in expenditure on imported foods. This is not the case in many of the fish exporter nations in Africa. In their case, fish exports generate foreign exchange that they use to meet other socio-political objectives; hardly is it aimed at solving the wider food needs. Therefore, one of the most immediate concerns of international fish trade is its impact on food security in the poor exporter nations.

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1980

(PDF contains 39 pages.)

Agricultural Best Management Practices and Treatment Wetlands in the Gabilan Watershed: Project Asessment and Evaluation Plan

Several local groups have come together for this project to addresses water quality concerns in the Gabilan Watershed – also known as the Reclamation Ditch Watershed (Fig. 1.1). These are Moss Landing Marine Laboratories (MLML), the Resource Conservation District of Monterey County (RCDMC), Central Coast Watershed Studies (CCoWS), Return of the Natives (RON), Community Alliance with Family Farmers (CAFF), and Coastal Conservation and Research (CC&R). The primary goal is to reduce non-point source pollution – particularly suspended sediment, nutrients, and pesticides – and thereby improve near-shore coastal waters of Moss Landing Harbor and the Monterey Bay. (Document contains 33 pages)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1981

Missing the April issue. (PDF has 26 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1982

(PDF contains 34 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1983

(PDF contains 112 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1984

(PDF contains 96 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1985

(PDF contains 84 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1986

(PDF contains 62 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1987

Missing November issue. (PDF contains 62 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1988

Missing July, August, October issues. (PDF contains 56 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1989

Missing June issue. (PDF contains 50 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1990

(PDF contains 118 pages.)

Soundings: the Newsletter of the Monterey Bay Chapter of the American Cetacean Society. 1991

(PDF contains 120 pages.)