Cultural variation in Africa: role of mechanisms of transmission and adaptation.

Cultural inheritance can be considered as a mechanism of adaptation made possible by communication, which has reached its greatest development in humans and can allow long-term conservation or rapid change of culturally transmissible traits depending on circumstances and needs. Conservativeness/flexibility is largely modulated by mechanisms of sociocultural transmission. An analysis was carried out by testing the fit of three models to 47 cultural traits (classified in six groups) in 277 African societies. Model A (demic diffusion) is conservation over generations, as shown by correlations of cultural traits with language, used as a measure of historical connection. Model B (environmental adaptation) is measured by correlation to the natural environment. Model C (cultural diffusion) is the spread to neighbors by social contact in an epidemic-like fashion and was tested by measuring the tightness of geographic clustering of the traits. Most traits examined, in particular those affecting family structure and kinship, showed great conservation over generations, as shown by the fit of model A. They are most probably transmitted by family members. This is in agreement with the theoretical demonstration that cultural transmission in the family (vertical) is the most conservative one. Some traits show environmental effects, indicating the importance of adaptation to physical environment. Only a few of the 47 traits showed tight geographic clustering indicating that their spread to nearest neighbors follows model C, as is usually the case for transmission among unrelated people (called horizontal transmission).

On the mechanism of skin wound "contraction": a granulation tissue "knockout" with a normal phenotype.

This report explores the mechanism of spontaneous closure of full-thickness skin wounds. The domestic pig, often used as a human analogue for skin wound repair studies, closes these wounds with kinetics similar to those in the guinea pig (mobile skin), even though the porcine dermis on the back is thick and nearly immobile. In the domestic pig, as in the guinea pig, daily full-thickness excisions of the central granulation tissue up to but not including the wound edges in both back and flank wounds do not alter the rate or completeness of wound closure or the final pattern of the scar. A purse-string mechanism of closure was precluded by showing that surgical interruption of wound edge continuity does not alter closure kinetics or wound shape. We conclude that "tightness" of skin is not a key factor nor is the central granulation tissue required for normal wound closure. These data imply that in vitro models such as contraction of isolated granulation tissue or of the cell-populated collagen lattice may not be relevant for understanding the cell biology of in vivo wound closure. Implications for the mechanism for wound closure are discussed.