Degradation of a Short-lived Glycoprotein from the Lumen of the Endoplasmic Reticulum: The Role of N-linked Glycans and the Unfolded Protein Response

We are studying endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (ERAD) with the use of a truncated variant of the type I ER transmembrane glycoprotein ribophorin I (RI). The mutant protein, RI332, containing only the N-terminal 332 amino acids of the luminal domain of RI, has been shown to interact with calnexin and to be a substrate for the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. When RI332 was expressed in HeLa cells, it was degraded with biphasic kinetics; an initial, slow phase of ∼45 min was followed by a second phase of threefold accelerated degradation. On the other hand, the kinetics of degradation of a form of RI332 in which the single used N-glycosylation consensus site had been removed (RI332-Thr) was monophasic and rapid, implying a role of the N-linked glycan in the first proteolytic phase. RI332 degradation was enhanced when the binding of glycoproteins to calnexin was prevented. Moreover, the truncated glycoprotein interacted with calnexin preferentially during the first proteolytic phase, which strongly suggests that binding of RI332 to the lectin-like protein may result in the slow, initial phase of degradation. Additionally, mannose trimming appears to be required for efficient proteolysis of RI332. After treatment of cells with the inhibitor of N-glycosylation, tunicamycin, destruction of the truncated RI variants was severely inhibited; likewise, in cells preincubated with the calcium ionophore A23187, both RI332 and RI332-Thr were stabilized, despite the presence or absence of the N-linked glycan. On the other hand, both drugs are known to trigger the unfolded protein response (UPR), resulting in the induction of BiP and other ER-resident proteins. Indeed, only in drug-treated cells could an interaction between BiP and RI332 and RI332-Thr be detected. Induction of BiP was also evident after overexpression of murine Ire1, an ER transmembrane kinase known to play a central role in the UPR pathway; at the same time, stabilization of RI332 was observed. Together, these results suggest that binding of the substrate proteins to UPR-induced chaperones affects their half lives.

Presentation of a cytosolic antigen by major histocompatibility complex class II molecules requires a long-lived form of the antigen

Class I and class II molecules of the major histocompatibility complex present peptides to T cells. Class I molecules bind peptides that have been generated in the cytosol by proteasomes and delivered into the endoplasmic reticulum by the transporter associated with antigen presentation. In contrast, class II molecules are very efficient in the presentation of antigens that have been internalized and processed in endosomal/lysosomal compartments. In addition, class II molecules can present some cytosolic antigens by a TAP-independent pathway. To test whether this endogenous class II presentation pathway was linked to proteasome-mediated degradation of antigen in the cytosol, the N-end rule was utilized to produce two forms of the influenza virus matrix protein with different in vivo half-lives (10 min vs. 5 h) when expressed in human B cells. Whereas class I molecules presented both the short- and the long-lived matrix proteins, class II molecules presented exclusively the long-lived form of antigen. Thus, rapid degradation of matrix protein in the cytosol precluded its presentation by class II molecules. These data suggest that the turnover of long-lived cytosolic proteins, some of which is mediated by delivery into endosomal/lysosomal compartments, provides a mechanism for immune surveillance by CD4+ T cells.