Image recognition: Visual grouping, recognition, and learning

Vision extracts useful information from images. Reconstructing the three-dimensional structure of our environment and recognizing the objects that populate it are among the most important functions of our visual system. Computer vision researchers study the computational principles of vision and aim at designing algorithms that reproduce these functions. Vision is difficult: the same scene may give rise to very different images depending on illumination and viewpoint. Typically, an astronomical number of hypotheses exist that in principle have to be analyzed to infer a correct scene description. Moreover, image information might be extracted at different levels of spatial and logical resolution dependent on the image processing task. Knowledge of the world allows the visual system to limit the amount of ambiguity and to greatly simplify visual computations. We discuss how simple properties of the world are captured by the Gestalt rules of grouping, how the visual system may learn and organize models of objects for recognition, and how one may control the complexity of the description that the visual system computes.

Somatic and germ cell parasitism in a colonial ascidian: Possible role for a highly polymorphic allorecognition system

A colonial protochordate, Botryllus schlosseri, undergoes a natural transplantation reaction in the wild that results alternatively in colony fusion (chimera formation) or inflammatory rejection. A single, highly polymorphic histocompatibility locus (called Fu/HC) is responsible for rejection versus fusion. Gonads are seeded and gametogenesis can occur in colonies well after fusion, and involves circulating germ-line progenitors. Buss proposed that colonial organisms might develop self/non-self histocompatibility systems to limit the possibility of interindividual germ cell “parasitism” (GCP) to histocompatible kin [Buss, L. W. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 5337–5341 and Buss, L. W. (1987) The Evolution of Individuality (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton]. Here we demonstrate in laboratory and field experiments that both somatic cell and (more importantly) germ-line parasitism are a common occurrence in fused chimeras. These experiments support the tenet in Buss’s hypothesis that germ cell and somatic cell parasitism can occur in fused chimeras and that a somatic appearance may mask the winner of a gametic war. They also provide an interesting challenge to develop formulas that describe the inheritance of competing germ lines rather than competing individuals. The fact that fused B. schlosseri have higher rates of GCP than unfused colonies additionally provides a rational explanation for the generation and maintenance of a high degree of Fu/HC polymorphism, largely limiting GCP to sibling offspring.

Memory for object features versus memory for object location: a positron-emission tomography study of encoding and retrieval processes.

Regional cerebral blood flow was measured with positron-emission tomography during two encoding and two retrieval tasks that were designed to compare memory for object features with memory for object locations. Bilateral increases in regional cerebral blood flow were observed in both anterior and posterior regions of inferior temporal cortex and in ventral regions of prestriate cortex, when the condition that required retrieval of object locations was subtracted from the condition that required retrieval of object features. During encoding, these changes were less pronounced and were restricted to the left inferior temporal cortex and right ventral prestriate cortex. In contrast, both encoding and retrieval of object location were associated with bilateral changes in dorsal prestriate and posterior parietal cortex. Finally, the two encoding conditions activated left frontal lobe regions preferentially, whereas the two retrieval conditions activated right frontal lobe regions. These findings confirm that, in human subjects, memory for object features is mediated by a distributed system that includes ventral prestriate cortex and both anterior and posterior regions of the inferior temporal gyrus. In contrast, memory for the locations of objects appears to be mediated by an anatomically distinct system that includes more dorsal regions of prestriate cortex and posterior regions of the parietal lobe.