Long-range transport of mineral dust in the global atmosphere: Impact of African dust on the environment of the southeastern United States

Soil dust is a major constituent of airborne particles in the global atmosphere. Dust plumes frequently cover huge areas of the earth; they are one of the most prominent and commonly visible features in satellite imagery. Dust is believed to play a role in many biogeochemical processes, but the importance of dust in these processes is not well understood because of the dearth of information about the global distribution of dust and its physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties. This paper describes some features of the large-scale distribution of dust and identifies some of the geological characteristics of important source areas. The transport of dust from North Africa is presented as an example of possible long-range dust effects, and the impact of African dust on environmental processes in the western North Atlantic and the southeastern United States is assessed. Dust transported over long distances usually has a mass median diameter <10 μm. Small wind-borne soil particles show signs of extensive weathering; consequently, the physical and chemical properties of the particles will greatly depend on the weathering history in the source region and on the subsequent modifications that occur during transit in the atmosphere (typically a period of a week or more). To fully understand the role of dust in the environment and in human health, mineralogists will have to work closely with scientists in other disciplines to characterize the properties of mineral particles as an ensemble and as individual particles especially with regard to surface characteristics.

Interaction of two arginine residues in lactate oxidase with the enzyme flavin: Conversion of FMN to 8-formyl-FMN

Two arginine residues, Arg-181 and Arg-268, are conserved throughout the known family of FMN-containing enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of α-hydroxyacids. In the lactate oxidase from Aerococcus viridans, these residues have been changed to lysine in two single mutations and in a double mutant form. In addition, Arg-181 has been replaced by methionine to determine the effect of removing the positive charge on the residue. The effects of these replacements on the kinetic and thermodynamic properties are reported. With all mutant forms, there are only small effects on the reactivity of the reduced flavin with oxygen. On the other hand, the efficiency of reduction of the oxidized flavin by l-lactate is greatly reduced, particularly with the R268K mutant forms. The results demonstrate the importance of the two arginine residues in the binding of substrate and its interaction with the flavin, and are consistent with a previous hypothesis that they also play a role of charge neutralization in the transition state of substrate dehydrogenation. The replacement of Arg-268 by lysine also results in a slow conversion of the 8-CH3- substituent of FMN to yield 8-formyl-FMN, still tightly bound to the enzyme, and with significantly different physical and chemical properties from those of the FMN-enzyme.

Protein–RNA interactions: a structural analysis

A detailed computational analysis of 32 protein–RNA complexes is presented. A number of physical and chemical properties of the intermolecular interfaces are calculated and compared with those observed in protein–double-stranded DNA and protein–single-stranded DNA complexes. The interface properties of the protein–RNA complexes reveal the diverse nature of the binding sites. van der Waals contacts played a more prevalent role than hydrogen bond contacts, and preferential binding to guanine and uracil was observed. The positively charged residue, arginine, and the single aromatic residues, phenylalanine and tyrosine, all played key roles in the RNA binding sites. A comparison between protein–RNA and protein–DNA complexes showed that whilst base and backbone contacts (both hydrogen bonding and van der Waals) were observed with equal frequency in the protein–RNA complexes, backbone contacts were more dominant in the protein–DNA complexes. Although similar modes of secondary structure interactions have been observed in RNA and DNA binding proteins, the current analysis emphasises the differences that exist between the two types of nucleic acid binding protein at the atomic contact level.