Coordinate regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuronal firing patterns by cytosolic calcium and store depletion

Elevation of cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in excitable cells often acts as a negative feedback signal on firing of action potentials and the associated voltage-gated Ca2+ influx. Increased [Ca2+]i stimulates Ca2+-sensitive K+ channels (IK-Ca), and this, in turn, hyperpolarizes the cell and inhibits Ca2+ influx. However, in some cells expressing IK-Ca the elevation in [Ca2+]i by depletion of intracellular stores facilitates voltage-gated Ca2+ influx. This phenomenon was studied in hypothalamic GT1 neuronal cells during store depletion caused by activation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors and inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum (Ca2+)ATPase with thapsigargin. GnRH induced a rapid spike increase in [Ca2+]i accompanied by transient hyperpolarization, followed by a sustained [Ca2+]i plateau during which the depolarized cells fired with higher frequency. The transient hyperpolarization was caused by the initial spike in [Ca2+]i and was mediated by apamin-sensitive IK-Ca channels, which also were operative during the subsequent depolarization phase. Agonist-induced depolarization and increased firing were independent of [Ca2+]i and were not mediated by inhibition of K+ current, but by facilitation of a voltage-insensitive, Ca2+-conducting inward current. Store depletion by thapsigargin also activated this inward depolarizing current and increased the firing frequency. Thus, the pattern of firing in GT1 neurons is regulated coordinately by apamin-sensitive SK current and store depletion-activated Ca2+ current. This dual control of pacemaker activity facilitates voltage-gated Ca2+ influx at elevated [Ca2+]i levels, but also protects cells from Ca2+ overload. This process may also provide a general mechanism for the integration of voltage-gated Ca2+ influx into receptor-controlled Ca2+ mobilization.

hSK4, a member of a novel subfamily of calcium-activated potassium channels

The gene for hSK4, a novel human small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel, or SK channel, has been identified and expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. In physiological saline hSK4 generates a conductance of approximately 12 pS, a value in close agreement with that of other cloned SK channels. Like other members of this family, the polypeptide encoded by hSK4 contains a previously unnoted leucine zipper-like domain in its C terminus of unknown function. hSK4 appears unique, however, in its very high affinity for Ca2+ (EC50 of 95 nM) and its predominant expression in nonexcitable tissues of adult animals. Together with the relatively low homology of hSK4 to other SK channel polypeptides (approximately 40% identical), these data suggest that hSK4 belongs to a novel subfamily of SK channels.

Excitation–contraction coupling is unaffected by drastic alteration of the sequence surrounding residues L720–L764 of the α1S II-III loop

The II-III loop of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) α1S subunit is responsible for bidirectional-signaling interactions with the ryanodine receptor (RyR1): transmitting an orthograde, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling signal to RyR1 and receiving a retrograde, current-enhancing signal from RyR1. Previously, several reports argued for the importance of two distinct regions of the skeletal II-III loop (residues R681–L690 and residues L720–Q765, respectively), claiming for each a key function in DHPR–RyR1 communication. To address whether residues 720–765 of the II-III loop are sufficient to enable skeletal-type (Ca2+ entry-independent) EC coupling and retrograde interaction with RyR1, we constructed a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged chimera (GFP-SkLM) having rabbit skeletal (Sk) DHPR sequence except for a II-III loop (L) from the DHPR of the house fly, Musca domestica (M). The Musca II-III loop (75% dissimilarity to α1S) has no similarity to α1S in the regions R681–L690 and L720–Q765. GFP-SkLM expressed in dysgenic myotubes (which lack endogenous α1S subunits) was unable to restore EC coupling and displayed strongly reduced Ca2+ current densities despite normal surface expression levels and correct triad targeting (colocalization with RyR1). Introducing rabbit α1S residues L720–L764 into the Musca II-III loop of GFP-SkLM (substitution for Musca DHPR residues E724–T755) completely restored bidirectional coupling, indicating its dependence on α1S loop residues 720–764 but its independence from other regions of the loop. Thus, 45 α1S-residues embedded in a very dissimilar background are sufficient to restore bidirectional coupling, indicating that these residues may be a site of a protein–protein interaction required for bidirectional coupling.

Antisense DNA downregulation of the ERBB2 oncogene measured by a flow cytometric assay.

A causal role has been inferred for ERBB2 overexpression in the etiology of breast cancer and other epithelial malignancies. The development of therapeutics that inhibit this tyrosine kinase cell surface receptor remains a high priority. This report describes the specific downregulation of ERBB2 protein and mRNA in the breast cancer cell line SK-BR-3 by using antisense DNA phosphorothioates. An approach was developed to examine antisense effects which allows simultaneous measurements of antisense dose and gene specific regulation on a per cell basis. A fluorescein isothiocyanate end-labeled tracer oligonucleotide was codelivered with antisense DNA followed by immunofluorescent staining for ERBB2 protein expression. Two-color flow cytometry measured the amount of both intracellular oligonucleotide and ERBB2 protein. In addition, populations of cells that received various doses of nucleic acids were physically separated and studied. In any given transfection, a 100-fold variation in oligonucleotide dosage was found. ERBB2 protein expression was reduced greater than 50%, but only in cells within a relatively narrow uptake range. Steady-state ERBB2 mRNA levels were selectively diminished, indicating a specific antisense effect. Cells receiving the optimal antisense dose were sorted and analyzed for cell cycle changes. After 2 days of ERBB2 suppression, breast cancer cells showed an accumulation in the G1 phase of the cell cycle.