Increased sexual activity reduces male immune function in Drosophila melanogaster

Despite the benefits of resistance, susceptibility to infectious disease is commonplace. Although specific susceptibility may be considered an inevitable consequence of the co-evolutionary arms race between parasite and host, a more general constraint may arise from the cost of an immune response. This “cost” hypothesis predicts a tradeoff between immune defense and other components of fitness. In particular, a tradeoff between immunity and sexually selected male behavior has been proposed. Here we provide experimental support for the direct phenotypic tradeoff between sexual activity and immunity by studying the antibacterial immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Males exposed to more females showed a reduced ability to clear a bacterial infection, an effect that we experimentally link to changes in sexual activity. Our results suggest immunosuppression is an important cost of reproduction and that immune function and levels of disease susceptibility will be influenced by sexual selection.

Interaction of the human androgen receptor transactivation function with the general transcription factor TFIIF

The human androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates genes important for male sexual differentiation and development. To better understand the role of the receptor as a transcription factor we have studied the mechanism of action of the N-terminal transactivation function. In a protein–protein interaction assay the AR N terminus (amino acids 142–485) selectively bound to the basal transcription factors TFIIF and the TATA-box-binding protein (TBP). Reconstitution of the transactivation activity in vitro revealed that AR142–485 fused to the LexA protein DNA-binding domain was competent to activate a reporter gene in the presence of a competing DNA template lacking LexA binding sites. Furthermore, consistent with direct interaction with basal transcription factors, addition of recombinant TFIIF relieved squelching of basal transcription by AR142–485. Taken together these results suggest that one mechanism of transcriptional activation by the AR involves binding to TFIIF and recruitment of the transcriptional machinery.