Intrastriatal injection of an adenoviral vector expressing glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor prevents dopaminergic neuron degeneration and behavioral impairment in a rat model of Parkinson disease

Glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent neurotrophic factor for adult nigral dopamine neurons in vivo. GDNF has both protective and restorative effects on the nigro-striatal dopaminergic (DA) system in animal models of Parkinson disease. Appropriate administration of this factor is essential for the success of its clinical application. Since it cannot cross the blood–brain barrier, a gene transfer method may be appropriate for delivery of the trophic factor to DA cells. We have constructed a recombinant adenovirus (Ad) encoding GDNF and injected it into rat striatum to make use of its ability to infect neurons and to be retrogradely transported by DA neurons. Ad-GDNF was found to drive production of large amounts of GDNF, as quantified by ELISA. The GDNF produced after gene transfer was biologically active: it increased the survival and differentiation of DA neurons in vitro. To test the efficacy of the Ad-mediated GDNF gene transfer in vivo, we used a progressive lesion model of Parkinson disease. Rats received injections unilaterally into their striatum first of Ad and then 6 days later of 6-hydroxydopamine. We found that mesencephalic nigral dopamine neurons of animals treated with the Ad-GDNF were protected, whereas those of animals treated with the Ad-β-galactosidase were not. This protection was associated with a difference in motor function: amphetamine-induced turning was much lower in animals that received the Ad-GDNF than in the animals that received Ad-β-galactosidase. This finding may have implications for the development of a treatment for Parkinson disease based on the use of neurotrophic factors.

Virus neutralization by germ-line vs. hypermutated antibodies

Mice infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), a cytopathic virus closely related to rabies virus, mount a virus-neutralizing antibody response protecting against lethal disease. VSVneutralizing monoclonal IgGs isolated from primary immune responses were devoid of somatic mutations, whereas most secondary and all hyperimmune response IgGs tested were hypermutated. A comparative analysis of recombinant single-chain antibody fragments (scFv-Cκ) revealed that even the germ-line precursor of one hypermutated antibody bound and neutralized VSV. Four somatic amino acid substitutions in VH increased by 300-fold the binding strength of monovalent scFv-Cκ. The multivalent binding avidity of germ-line scFv-Cκ was increased by more than 10-fold compared with the monovalent binding strength. In contrast, hypermutated scFv-Cκ did not show such avidity effects. Thus the overall binding difference between the germ-line and the hypermutated VSV-neutralizing antibody was only 10- to 15-fold. This may explain why primary germ-line antibodies and secondary hypermutated antibodies directed against pathogens such as viruses and bacteria expressing repetitive antibody determinants show rather similar binding qualities, whereas monovalently binding hapten-specific antibodies can show “affinity maturation” effects of up to 1000-fold.