The AMPA receptor subunit GluR-B in its Q/R site-unedited form is not essential for brain development and function

Calcium permeability of l-α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptors (AMPARs) in excitatory neurons of the mammalian brain is prevented by coassembly of the GluR-B subunit, which carries an arginine (R) residue at a critical site of the channel pore. The codon for this arginine is created by site-selective adenosine deamination of an exonic glutamine (Q) codon at the pre-mRNA level. Thus, central neurons can potentially control the calcium permeability of AMPARs by the level of GluR-B gene expression as well as by the extent of Q/R-site editing, which in postnatal brain, positions the R codon into >99% of GluR-B mRNA. To study whether the small amount of unedited GluR-B is of functional relevance, we have generated mice carrying GluR-B alleles with an exonic arginine codon. We report that these mutants manifest no obvious deficiencies, indicating that AMPAR-mediated calcium influx into central neurons can be solely regulated by the levels of Q/R site-edited GluR-B relative to other AMPAR subunits. Notably, a targeted GluR-B gene mutant with 30% reduced GluR-B levels had 2-fold higher AMPAR-mediated calcium permeability in hippocampal pyramidal cells with no sign of cytotoxicity. This constitutes proof in vivo that elevated calcium influx through AMPARs need not generate pathophysiological consequences.

Connexin expression in electrically coupled postnatal rat brain neurons

Electrical coupling by gap junctions is an important form of cell-to-cell communication in early brain development. Whereas glial cells remain electrically coupled at postnatal stages, adult vertebrate neurons were thought to communicate mainly via chemical synapses. There is now accumulating evidence that in certain neuronal cell populations the capacity for electrical signaling by gap junction channels is still present in the adult. Here we identified electrically coupled pairs of neurons between postnatal days 12 and 18 in rat visual cortex, somatosensory cortex, and hippocampus. Notably, coupling was found both between pairs of inhibitory neurons and between inhibitory and excitatory neurons. Molecular analysis by single-cell reverse transcription–PCR revealed a differential expression pattern of connexins in these identified neurons.