Fluid shear stress inhibits TNF-α activation of JNK but not ERK1/2 or p38 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: Inhibitory crosstalk among MAPK family members

Atherosclerosis preferentially occurs in areas of turbulent flow and low fluid shear stress, whereas laminar flow and high shear stress are atheroprotective. Inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-1 stimulate expression of endothelial cell (EC) genes that may promote atherosclerosis. TNF-α and IL-1 regulate gene expression in ECs, in part, by stimulating mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), which phosphorylate transcription factors. We hypothesized that steady laminar flow inhibits cytokine-mediated activation of MAPK in EC. To test this hypothesis, we determined the effects of flow (shear stress = 12 dynes/cm2) on TNF-α and IL-1-stimulated activity of three MAPK in human umbilical vein ECs (HUVEC): extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), p38, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). Flow alone stimulated ERK1/2 and p38 activity but decreased JNK activity compared with static controls. TNF-α or IL-1 alone activated ERK1/2, p38, and JNK maximally at 15 min in HUVEC. Preexposing HUVEC for 10 min to flow inhibited TNF-α and IL-1 activation of JNK by 46% and 49%, respectively, but had no significant effect on ERK1/2 or p38 activation. Incubation of HUVEC with PD98059, which inhibits flow-mediated ERK1/2 activation, prevented flow from inhibiting cytokine activation of JNK. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, which strongly activates ERK1/2, also inhibited TNF-α activation of JNK. These findings indicate that fluid shear stress inhibits TNF-α-mediated signaling events in HUVEC via the activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Inhibition of TNF-α signal transduction represents a mechanism by which steady laminar flow may exert atheroprotective effects on the endothelium.

A fast, high resolution, second-order central scheme for incompressible flows

A high resolution, second-order central difference method for incompressible flows is presented. The method is based on a recent second-order extension of the classic Lax–Friedrichs scheme introduced for hyperbolic conservation laws (Nessyahu H. & Tadmor E. (1990) J. Comp. Physics. 87, 408-463; Jiang G.-S. & Tadmor E. (1996) UCLA CAM Report 96-36, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., in press) and augmented by a new discrete Hodge projection. The projection is exact, yet the discrete Laplacian operator retains a compact stencil. The scheme is fast, easy to implement, and readily generalizable. Its performance was tested on the standard periodic double shear-layer problem; no spurious vorticity patterns appear when the flow is underresolved. A short discussion of numerical boundary conditions is also given, along with a numerical example.

Nonuniformity of the constitutive law parameters for shear rupture and quasistatic nucleation to dynamic rupture: a physical model of earthquake generation processes.

Based on the recent high-resolution laboratory experiments on propagating shear rupture, the constitutive law that governs shear rupture processes is discussed in view of the physical principles and constraints, and a specific constitutive law is proposed for shear rupture. It is demonstrated that nonuniform distributions of the constitutive law parameters on the fault are necessary for creating the nucleation process, which consists of two phases: (i) a stable, quasistatic phase, and (ii) the subsequent accelerating phase. Physical models of the breakdown zone and the nucleation zone are presented for shear rupture in the brittle regime. The constitutive law for shear rupture explicitly includes a scaling parameter Dc that enables one to give a common interpretation to both small scale rupture in the laboratory and large scale rupture as earthquake source in the Earth. Both the breakdown zone size Xc and the nucleation zone size L are prescribed and scaled by Dc, which in turn is prescribed by a characteristic length lambda c representing geometrical irregularities of the fault. The models presented here make it possible to understand the earthquake generation process from nucleation to unstable, dynamic rupture propagation in terms of physics. Since the nucleation process itself is an immediate earthquake precursor, deep understanding of the nucleation process in terms of physics is crucial for the short-term (or immediate) earthquake prediction.