Rapid and efficient fusion of phospholipid vesicles by the α-helical core of a SNARE complex in the absence of an N-terminal regulatory domain

A protease-resistant core domain of the neuronal SNARE complex consists of an α-helical bundle similar to the proposed fusogenic core of viral fusion proteins [Skehel, J. J. & Wiley, D. C. (1998) Cell 95, 871–874]. We find that the isolated core of a SNARE complex efficiently fuses artificial bilayers and does so faster than full length SNAREs. Unexpectedly, a dramatic increase in speed results from removal of the N-terminal domain of the t-SNARE syntaxin, which does not affect the rate of assembly of v-t SNARES. In the absence of this negative regulatory domain, the half-time for fusion of an entire population of lipid vesicles by isolated SNARE cores (≈10 min) is compatible with the kinetics of fusion in many cell types.

Membrane-bound state of the colicin E1 channel domain as an extended two-dimensional helical array

Atomic level structures have been determined for the soluble forms of several colicins and toxins, but the structural changes that occur after membrane binding have not been well characterized. Changes occurring in the transition from the soluble to membrane-bound state of the C-terminal 190-residue channel polypeptide of colicin E1 (P190) bound to anionic membranes are described. In the membrane-bound state, the α-helical content increases from 60–64% to 80–90%, with a concomitant increase in the average length of the helical segments from 12 to 16 or 17 residues, close to the length required to span the membrane bilayer in the open channel state. The average distance between helical segments is increased and interhelix interactions are weakened, as shown by a major loss of tertiary structure interactions, decreased efficiency of fluorescence resonance energy transfer from an energy donor on helix V of P190 to an acceptor on helix IX, and decreased resonance energy transfer at higher temperatures, not observed in soluble P190, implying freedom of motion of helical segments. Weaker interactions are also shown by a calorimetric thermal transition of low cooperativity, and the extended nature of the helical array is shown by a 3- to 4-fold increase in the average area subtended per molecule to 4,200 Å2 on the membrane surface. The latter, with analysis of the heat capacity changes, implies the absence of a developed hydrophobic core in the membrane-bound P190. The membrane interfacial layer thus serves to promote formation of a highly helical extended two-dimensional flexible net. The properties of the membrane-bound state of the colicin channel domain (i.e., hydrophobic anchor, lengthened and loosely coupled α-helices, and close association with the membrane interfacial layer) are plausible structural features for the state that is a prerequisite for voltage gating, formation of transmembrane helices, and channel opening.

The N-terminal tail of histone H2A binds to two distinct sites within the nucleosome core

Each of the core histone proteins within the nucleosome has a central “structured” domain that comprises the spool onto which the DNA superhelix is wrapped and an N-terminal “tail” domain in which the structure and molecular interactions have not been rigorously defined. Recent studies have shown that the N-terminal domains of core histones probably contact both DNA and proteins within the nucleus and that these interactions play key roles in the regulation of nuclear processes (such as transcription and replication) and are critical in the formation of the chromatin fiber. An understanding of these complex mechanisms awaits identification of the DNA or protein sites within chromatin contacted by the tail domains. To this end, we have developed a site-specific histone protein–DNA photocross-linking method to identify the DNA binding sites of the N-terminal domains within chromatin complexes. With this approach, we demonstrate that the N-terminal tail of H2A binds DNA at two defined locations within isolated nucleosome cores centered around a position ≈40 bp from the nucleosomal dyad and that this tail probably adopts a defined structure when bound to DNA.

The helical domain of a G protein α subunit is a regulator of its effector

The α subunit (Gα) of heterotrimeric G proteins is a major determinant of signaling selectivity. The Gα structure essentially comprises a GTPase “Ras-like” domain (RasD) and a unique α-helical domain (HD). We used the vertebrate phototransduction model to test for potential functions of HD and found that the HD of the retinal transducin Gα (Gαt) and the closely related gustducin (Gαg), but not Gαi1, Gαs, or Gαq synergistically enhance guanosine 5′-γ[-thio]triphosphate bound Gαt (GαtGTPγS) activation of bovine rod cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE). In addition, both HDt and HDg, but not HDi1, HDs, or HDq attenuate the trypsin-activated PDE. GαtGDP and HDt attenuation of trypsin-activated PDE saturate with similar affinities and to an identical 38% of initial activity. These data suggest that interaction of intact Gαt with the PDE catalytic core may be caused by the HD moiety, and they indicate an independent site(s) for the HD moiety of Gαt within the PDE catalytic core in addition to the sites for the inhibitory Pγ subunits. The HD moiety of GαtGDP is an attenuator of the activated catalytic core, whereas in the presence of activated GαtGTPγS the independently expressed HDt is a potent synergist. Rhodopsin catalysis of Gαt activation enhances the PDE activation produced by subsaturating levels of Gαt, suggesting a HD-moiety synergism from a transient conformation of Gαt. These results establish HD-selective regulations of vertebrate retinal PDE, and they provide evidence demonstrating that the HD is a modulatory domain. We suggest that the HD works in concert with the RasD, enhancing the efficiency of G protein signaling.

Direct interaction of flagellin termini essential for polymorphic ability of flagellar filament

We report the structures of flagellar filaments reconstituted from various flagellins with small terminal truncations. Flagellins from Salmonella typhimurium strains SJW1103 (wild type), SJW1660, and SJW1655 were used, which form a left-handed supercoil, the L- and R-type straight forms, respectively. Structure analyses were done by electron cryomicroscopy and helical image reconstruction with a help of x-ray fiber diffraction for determining precise helical symmetries. Truncation of either terminal region, irrespective of the original flagellin species, results in a straight filament having a helical symmetry distinct either from the L- or R-type. This filament structure is named Lt-type. Although the local subunit packing is similar in all three types, a close comparison shows that the Lt-type packing is almost identical to the R-type but distinct from the L-type, which demonstrates the strong two-state preference of the subunit interactions. The structure clearly suggests that both termini are located in the inner tube of the concentric double-tubular structure of the filament core, and their proper interaction is responsible for the correct folding of fairly large terminal regions that form the inner tube. The double tubular structure appears to be essential for the polymorphic ability of flagellar filaments, which is required for the swimming–tumbling of bacterial taxis.

Preferential interaction of the core histone tail domains with linker DNA

Within chromatin, the core histone tail domains play critical roles in regulating the structure and accessibility of nucleosomal DNA within the chromatin fiber. Thus, many nuclear processes are facilitated by concomitant posttranslational modification of these domains. However, elucidation of the mechanisms by which the tails mediate such processes awaits definition of tail interactions within chromatin. In this study we have investigated the primary DNA target of the majority of the tails in mononucleosomes. The results clearly show that the tails bind preferentially to “linker” DNA, outside of the DNA encompassed by the nucleosome core. These results have important implications for models of tail function within the chromatin fiber and for in vitro structural and functional studies using nucleosome core particles.

Domain structure and dynamics in the helical filaments formed by RecA and Rad51 on DNA

Both the bacterial RecA protein and the eukaryotic Rad51 protein form helical nucleoprotein filaments on DNA that catalyze strand transfer between two homologous DNA molecules. However, only the ATP-binding cores of these proteins have been conserved, and this same core is also found within helicases and the F1-ATPase. The C-terminal domain of the RecA protein forms lobes within the helical RecA filament. However, the Rad51 proteins do not have the C-terminal domain found in RecA, but have an N-terminal extension that is absent in the RecA protein. Both the RecA C-terminal domain and the Rad51 N-terminal domain bind DNA. We have used electron microscopy to show that the lobes of the yeast and human Rad51 filaments appear to be formed by N-terminal domains. These lobes are conformationally flexible in both RecA and Rad51. Within RecA filaments, the change between the “active” and “inactive” states appears to mainly involve a large movement of the C-terminal lobe. The N-terminal domain of Rad51 and the C-terminal domain of RecA may have arisen from convergent evolution to play similar roles in the filaments.

What determines the folding of the chromatin fiber?

In this review, we attempt to summarize, in a critical manner, what is currently known about the processes of condensation and decondensation of chromatin fibers. We begin with a critical analysis of the possible mechanisms for condensation, considering both old and new evidence as to whether the linker DNA between nucleosomes bends or remains straight in the condensed structure. Concluding that the preponderance of evidence is for straight linkers, we ask what other fundamental process might allow condensation, and argue that there is evidence for linker histone-induced contraction of the internucleosome angle, as salt concentration is raised toward physiological levels. We also ask how certain specific regions of chromatin can become decondensed, even at physiological salt concentration, to allow transcription. We consider linker histone depletion and acetylation of the core histone tails, as possible mechanisms. On the basis of recent evidence, we suggest a unified model linking targeted acetylation of specific genomic regions to linker histone depletion, with unfolding of the condensed fiber as a consequence.

Alpha-helical, but not beta-sheet, propensity of proline is determined by peptide environment.

Proline is established as a potent breaker of both alpha-helical and beta-sheet structures in soluble (globular) proteins. Thus, the frequent occurrence of the Pro residue in the putative transmembrane helices of integral membrane proteins, particularly transport proteins, presents a structural dilemma. We propose that this phenomenon results from the fact that the structural propensity of a given amino acid may be altered to conform to changes imposed by molecular environment. To test this hypothesis on proline, we synthesized model peptides of generic sequence H2N-(Ser-LyS)2-Ala- Leu-Z-Ala-Leu-Z-Trp-Ala-Leu-Z-(Lys-Ser)3-OH (Z = Ala and/or Pro). Peptide conformations were analyzed by circular dichroism spectroscopy in aqueous buffer, SDS, lysophosphatidylglycerol micelles, and organic solvents (methanol, trifluoroethanol, and 2-propanol). The helical propensity of Pro was found to be greatly enhanced in the membrane-mimetic environments of both lipid micelles and organic solvents. Proline was found to stabilize the alpha-helical conformation relative to Ala at elevated temperatures in 2-propanol, an observation that argues against the doctrine that Pro is the most potent alpha-helix breaker as established in aqueous media. Parallel studies in deoxycholate micelles of the temperature-induced conformational transitions of the single-spanning membrane bacteriophage IKe major coat protein, in which the Pro-containing wild type was compared with Pro30 --> Ala mutant, Pro was found to protect the helix, but disrupt the beta-sheet structure as effectively as it does to model peptides in water. The intrinsic capacity of Pro to disrupt beta-sheets was further reflected in a survey of porins where Pro was found to be selectively excluded from the core of membrane-spanning beta-sheet barrels. The overall data provide a rationale for predicting and understanding the structural consequences when Pro occurs in the context of a membrane.