2 resultados para harlequin

em National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The reduction of 12-oxophytodienoic acid (OPDA) to 3-oxo-2(2′[Z]-pentenyl)-cyclopentane-1-octanoic acid is catalyzed by 12-oxophytodienoate-10,11-reductase (OPR). Analysis of the isomer preference of OPR has indicated that the activity is composed of two isoenzymes exhibiting different stereoselectivities. The two isoforms of OPR have been separated, using protein extracts of Rock Harlequin (Corydalis sempervirens) as the starting material. OPRI, the enzyme reported earlier from the same species and corresponding to the cloned OPR from Arabidopsis, utilized 9R,13R-OPDA >> 9S,13R-OPDA but not the 13S-configured isomers, whereas the new activity, OPRII, effectively reduced all four OPDA isomers, including the natural 9S,13S-OPDA (cis-[+]-OPDA). OPRII activity is characterized in detail. The enzyme's enzymatic, biochemical, and immunological properties prove that it is a close relative of OPRI. The roles of OPRI and OPRII in octadecanoid biology are discussed.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The method of Matsumoto and Ohta [Matsumoto, K. & Ohta, T. (1992) Chromosoma 102, 60-65; Matsumoto, K. & Ohta, T. (1995) Mutat. Res. 326, 93-98] to induce large numbers of endoreduplicated Chinese hamster ovary cells has now been coupled with the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa method of Perry and Wolff [Perry, P. & Wolff, S. (1974) Nature (London) 251, 156-158] to produce harlequin endoreduplicated chromosomes that after the third round of DNA replication are composed of a chromosome with a light chromatid and a dark chromatid in close apposition to its sister chromosome containing two light chromatids. Unless the pattern is disrupted by sister chromatid exchange (SCE), the dark chromatid is always in the center, so that the order of the chromatids is light-dark light-light. The advent of this method, which permits the observation of SCEs in endoreduplicated cells, makes it possible to determine with great ease in which cell cycle an SCE occurred. This now allows us to approach several vexing questions about the induction of SCEs (genetic damage and its repair) after exposure to various types of mutagenic carcinogens. The present experiments have allowed us to observe how many cell cycles various types of lesions that are induced in DNA by a crosslinking agent, an alkylating agent, or ionizing radiation, and that are responsible for the induction of SCEs, persist before being repaired and thus lose their ability to inflict genetic damage. Other experiments with various types of mutagenic carcinogens and various types of cell lines that have defects in different DNA repair processes, such as mismatch repair, excision repair, crosslink repair, and DNA-strand-break repair, can now be carried out to determine the role of these types of repair in removing specific types of lesions.