The “Spot 14” gene resides on the telomeric end of the 11q13 amplicon and is expressed in lipogenic breast cancers: Implications for control of tumor metabolism

Enhanced long chain fatty acid synthesis may occur in breast cancer, where it is necessary for tumor growth and predicts a poor prognosis. “Spot 14” (S14) is a carbohydrate- and thyroid hormone-inducible nuclear protein specific to liver, adipose, and lactating mammary tissues that functions to activate genes encoding the enzymes of fatty acid synthesis. Amplification of chromosome region 11q13, where the S14 gene (THRSP) resides, also predicts a poor prognosis in breast tumors. We localized the S14 gene between markers D11S906 and D11S937, at the telomeric end of the amplified region at 11q13, and found that it was amplified and expressed in breast cancer-derived cell lines. Moreover, concordant expression of S14 and a key lipogenic enzyme (acetyl-CoA carboxylase) in a panel of primary breast cancer specimens strongly supported a role for S14 as a determinant of tumor lipid metabolism. S14 expression provides a pathophysiological link between two prognostic indicators in breast cancer: enhanced lipogenesis and 11q13 amplification.

Light-induced exposure of the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix seven in rhodopsin

A key step in signal transduction in the visual cell is the light-induced conformational change of rhodopsin that triggers the binding and activation of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein. Site-directed mAbs against bovine rhodopsin were produced and used to detect and characterize these conformational changes upon light activation. Among several antibodies that bound exclusively to the light-activated state, an antibody (IgG subclass) with the highest affinity (Ka ≈ 6 × 10−9 M) was further purified and characterized. The epitope of this antibody was mapped to the amino acid sequence 304–311. This epitope extends from the central region to the cytoplasmic end of the seventh transmembrane helix and incorporates a part of a highly conserved NPXXY motif, a critical region for signaling and agonist-induced internalization of several biogenic amine and peptide receptors. In the dark state, no binding of the antibody to rhodopsin was detected. Accessibility of the epitope to the antibody correlated with formation of the metarhodopsin II photointermediate and was reduced significantly at the metarhodopsin III intermediate. Further, incubation of the antigen–antibody complex with 11-cis-retinal failed to regenerate the native rhodopsin chromophore. These results suggest significant and reversible conformational changes in close proximity to the cytoplasmic end of the seventh transmembrane helix of rhodopsin that might be important for folding and signaling.

A Phosphothreonine Residue at the C-Terminal End of the Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Is Protected by Fusicoccin-Induced 14–3–3 Binding1

We have isolated the plasma membrane H+−ATPase in a phosphorylated form from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaf tissue incubated with fusicoccin, a fungal toxin that induces irreversible binding of 14–3–3 protein to the C terminus of the H+-ATPase, thus activating H+ pumping. We have identified threonine-948, the second residue from the C-terminal end of the H+-ATPase, as the phosphorylated amino acid. Turnover of the phosphate group of phosphothreonine-948 was inhibited by 14–3–3 binding, suggesting that this residue may form part of a binding motif for 14–3–3. This is the first identification to our knowledge of an in vivo phosphorylation site in the plant plasma membrane H+-ATPase.

Cleavage of poly(A) tails on the 3′-end of RNA by ribonuclease E of Escherichia coli

RNase E initiates the decay of Escherichia coli RNAs by cutting them internally near their 5′-end and is a component of the RNA degradosome complex, which also contains the 3′-exonuclease PNPase. Recently, RNase E has been shown to be able to remove poly(A) tails by what has been described as an exonucleolytic process that can be blocked by the presence of a phosphate group on the 3′-end of the RNA. We show here, however, that poly(A) tail removal by RNase E is in fact an endonucleolytic process that is regulated by the phosphorylation status at the 5′- but not the 3′-end of RNA. The rate of poly(A) tail removal by RNase E was found to be 30-fold greater when the 5′-terminus of RNA substrates was converted from a triphosphate to monophosphate group. This finding prompted us to re-analyse the contributions of the ribonucleolytic activities within the degradosome to 3′ attack since previous studies had only used substrates that had a triphosphate group on their 5′-end. Our results indicate that RNase E associated with the degradosome may contribute to the removal of poly(A) tails from 5′-monophosphorylated RNAs, but this is only likely to be significant should their attack by PNPase be blocked.

Protonatable residues at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix-2 in the signal transducer HtrI control photochemistry and function of sensory rhodopsin I.

Neutral residue replacements were made of 21 acidic and basic residues within the N-terminal half of the Halobacterium salinarium signal transducer HtrI [the halobacterial transducer for sensory rhodopsin I (SRI)] by site-specific mutagenesis. The replacements are all within the region of HtrI that we previously concluded from deletion analysis to contain sites of interaction with the phototaxis receptor SRI. Immunoblotting shows plasmid expression of the htrI-sopI operon containing the mutations produces SRI and mutant HtrI in cells at near wild-type levels. Six of the HtrI mutations perturb photochemical kinetics of SRI and one reverses the phototaxis response. Substitution with neutral amino acids of Asp-86, Glu-87, and Glu-108 accelerate, and of Arg-70, Arg-84, and Arg-99 retard, the SRI photocycle. Opposite effects on photocycle rate cancel in double mutants containing one replaced acidic and one replaced basic residue. Laser flash spectroscopy shows the kinetic perturbations are due to alteration of the rate of reprotonation of the retinylidene Schiff base. All of these mutations permit normal attractant and repellent signaling. On the other hand, the substitution of Glu-56 with the isosteric glutamine converts the normally attractant effect of orange light to a repellent signal in vivo at neutral pH (inverted signaling). Low pH corrects the inversion due to Glu-56 -> Gln and the apparent pK of the inversion is increased when arginine is substituted at position 56. The results indicate that the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane helix-2 and the initial part of the cytoplasmic domain contain interaction sites with SRI. To explain these and previous results, we propose a model in which (i) the HtrI region identified here forms part of an electrostatic bonding network that extends through the SRI protein and includes its photoactive site; (ii) alteration of this network by photoisomerization-induced Schiff base deprotonation and reprotonation shifts HtrI between attractant and repellent conformations; and (iii) HtrI mutations and extracellular pH alter the equilibrium ratios of these conformations.

The two single-strand cleavages at each end of Tn10 occur in a specific order during transposition.

During Tn10 transposition, the element is excised from the donor site by double-strand cleavages at the two transposon ends. Double-strand cleavage is a central step in the nonreplicative transposition reaction of many transposons in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Evidence is presented to show that the Tn10 double-strand cut is made by an ordered, sequential cleavage of the two strands. The transferred strand is cut first, and then the nontransferred strand is cleaved. The single-strand nicked intermediate is seen to accumulate when Mn2+ is substituted for Mg2+ in the reaction or when certain mutant transposases are used. The fact that the transferred strand is cleaved before the non-transferred strand implies that the order of strand cleavages is not the determining factor that precludes a replicative mechanism of transposition.

Autoregulation at the level of mRNA 3′ end formation of the suppressor of forked gene of Drosophila melanogaster is conserved in Drosophila virilis

The Drosophila melanogaster Suppressor of forked [Su(f)] protein shares homology with the yeast RNA14 protein and the 77-kDa subunit of human cleavage stimulation factor, which are proteins involved in mRNA 3′ end formation. This suggests a role for Su(f) in mRNA 3′ end formation in Drosophila. The su(f) gene produces three transcripts; two of them are polyadenylated at the end of the transcription unit, and one is a truncated transcript, polyadenylated in intron 4. Using temperature-sensitive su(f) mutants, we show that accumulation of the truncated transcript requires wild-type Su(f) protein. This suggests that the Su(f) protein autoregulates negatively its accumulation by stimulating 3′ end formation of the truncated su(f) RNA. Cloning of su(f) from Drosophila virilis and analysis of its RNA profile suggest that su(f) autoregulation is conserved in this species. Sequence comparison between su(f) from both species allows us to point out three conserved regions in intron 4 downstream of the truncated RNA poly(A) site. These conserved regions include the GU-rich downstream sequence involved in poly(A) site definition. Using transgenes truncated within intron 4, we show that sequence up to the conserved GU-rich domain is sufficient for production of the truncated RNA and for regulation of this production by su(f). Our results indicate a role of su(f) in the regulation of poly(A) site utilization and an important role of the GU-rich sequence for this regulation to occur.

Truncated elongation factor G lacking the G domain promotes translocation of the 3' end but not of the anticodon domain of peptidyl-tRNA.

The mechanism by which elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes the translocation of tRNAs and mRNA on the ribosome is not known. The reaction requires GTP, which is hydrolyzed to GDP. Here we show that EF-G from Escherichia coli lacking the G domain still catalyzed partial translocation in that it promoted the transfer of the 3' end of peptidyl-tRNA to the P site on the 50S ribosomal subunit into a puromycin-reactive state in a slow-turnover reaction. In contrast, it did not bring about translocation on the 30S subunit, since (i) deacylated tRNA was not released from the P site and (ii) the A site remained blocked for aminoacyl-tRNA binding during and after partial translocation. The reaction probably represents the first EF-G-dependent step of translocation that follows the spontaneous formation of the A/P state that is not puromycin-reactive [Moazed, D. & Noller, H. F. (1989) Nature (London) 342, 142-148]. In the complete system--i.e., with intact EF-G and GTP--the 50S phase of translocation is rapidly followed by the 30S phase during which the tRNAs together with the mRNA are shifted on the small ribosomal subunit, and GTP is hydrolyzed. As to the mechanism of EF-G function, the results show that the G domain has an important role, presumably exerted through interactions with other domains of EF-G, in the promotion of translocation on the small ribosomal subunit. The G domain's intramolecular interactions are likely to be modulated by GTP binding and hydrolysis.