A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks

A minimal hypothesis is proposed concerning the brain processes underlying effortful tasks. It distinguishes two main computational spaces: a unique global workspace composed of distributed and heavily interconnected neurons with long-range axons, and a set of specialized and modular perceptual, motor, memory, evaluative, and attentional processors. Workspace neurons are mobilized in effortful tasks for which the specialized processors do not suffice. They selectively mobilize or suppress, through descending connections, the contribution of specific processor neurons. In the course of task performance, workspace neurons become spontaneously coactivated, forming discrete though variable spatio-temporal patterns subject to modulation by vigilance signals and to selection by reward signals. A computer simulation of the Stroop task shows workspace activation to increase during acquisition of a novel task, effortful execution, and after errors. We outline predictions for spatio-temporal activation patterns during brain imaging, particularly about the contribution of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate to the workspace.

Control of alternative pre-mRNA splicing by distributed pentameric repeats

Multiple copies of the hexamer TGCATG have been shown to regulate fibronectin pre-mRNA alternative splicing. GCATG repeats also are clustered near the regulated calcitonin-specific 3′ splice site in the rat calcitonin/CGRP gene. Specific mutagenesis of these repeats in calcitonin/CGRP pre-mRNA resulted in the loss of calcitonin-specific splicing, suggesting that the native repeats act to enhance alternative exon inclusion. Mutation of subsets of these elements implies that alternative splicing requires a minimum of two repeats, and that the combination of one intronic and one exonic repeat is necessary for optimal cell-specific splicing. However, multimerized intronic repeats inhibited calcitonin-specific splicing in both the wild-type context and in a transcript lacking endogenous repeats. These results suggest that both the number and distribution of repeats may be important features for the regulation of tissue-specific alternative splicing. Further, RNA containing a single repeat bound cell-specific protein complexes, but tissue-specific differences in protein binding were not detected by using multimerized repeats. Together, these data support a novel model for alternative splicing regulation that requires the cell-specific recognition of multiple, distributed sequence elements.