Ribonucleoprotein infrastructure regulating the flow of genetic information between the genome and the proteome

Following transcription and splicing, each mRNA of a mammalian cell passes into the cytoplasm where its fate is in the hands of a complex network of ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs). The success or failure of a gene to be expressed depends on the performance of this mRNP infrastructure. The entry, gating, processing, and transit of each mRNA through an mRNP network helps determine the composition of a cell's proteome. The machinery that regulates storage, turnover, and translational activation of mRNAs is not well understood, in part, because of the heterogeneous nature of mRNPs. Recently, subsets of cellular mRNAs clustered as members of mRNP complexes have been identified by using antibodies reactive with RNA-binding proteins, including ELAV/Hu, eIF-4E, and poly(A)-binding proteins. Cytoplasmic ELAV/Hu proteins are involved in the stability and translation of early response gene (ERG) transcripts and are expressed predominately in neurons. mRNAs recovered from ELAV/Hu mRNP complexes were found to have similar sequence elements, suggesting a common structural linkage among them. This approach opens the possibility of identifying transcripts physically clustered in vivo that may have similar fates or functions. Moreover, the proteins encoded by physically organized mRNAs may participate in the same biological process or structural outcome, not unlike operons and their polycistronic mRNAs do in prokaryotic organisms. Our goal is to understand the organization and flow of genetic information on an integrative systems level by analyzing the collective properties of proteins and mRNAs associated with mRNPs in vivo.

Barriers to protein folding: formation of buried polar interactions is a slow step in acquisition of structure.

In the MYL mutant of the Arc repressor dimer, sets of partially buried salt-bridge and hydrogen-bond interactions mediated by Arg-31, Glu-36, and Arg-40 in each subunit are replaced by hydrophobic interactions between Met-31, Tyr-36, and Leu-40. The MYL refolding/dimerization reaction differs from that of wild type in being 10- to 1250-fold faster, having an earlier transition state, and depending upon viscosity but not ionic strength. Formation of the wild-type salt bridges in a hydrophobic environment clearly imposes a kinetic barrier to folding, which can be lowered by high salt concentrations. The changes in the position of the transition state and viscosity dependence can be explained if denatured monomers interact to form a partially folded dimeric intermediate, which then continues folding to form the native dimer. The second step is postulated to be rate limiting for wild type. Replacing the salt bridge with hydrophobic interactions lowers this barrier for MYL. This makes the first kinetic barrier rate limiting for MYL refolding and creates a downhill free-energy landscape in which most molecules which reach the intermediate state continue to form native dimers.

Residue replacements of buried aspartyl and related residues in sensory rhodopsin I: D201N produces inverted phototaxis signals.

Residue replacements were made at five positions (Arg-73, Asp-76, Tyr-87, Asp-106, and Asp-201) in the Halobacterium salinarium phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I) by site-specific mutagenesis. The sites were chosen for their correspondence in position to residues of functional importance in the homologous light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin found in the same organism. This work identifies a residue in SR-I shown to be of vital importance to its attractant signaling function: Asp-201. The effect of the substitution with the isosteric asparagine is to convert the normally attractant signal of orange light stimulation to a repellent signal. In contrast, similar neutral substitution of the four other ionizable residues near the photoactive site allows essentially normal attractant and repellent phototaxis signaling. Wild-type two-photon repellent signaling by the receptor is intact in the Asp-201 mutant, genetically separating the wild-type attractant and repellent signal generation processes. A possible explanation and implications of the inverted signaling are discussed. Results of neutral residue substitution for Asp-76 confirm our previous evidence that proton transfer reactions involving this residue are not important to phototaxis but that Asp-76 functions as the Schiff base proton acceptor in proton translocation by transducer-free SR-I.