1 resultado para Troeltsch, Ernst, 1865-1923
em National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (8)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (17)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (48)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (15)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (47)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (2)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (36)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (10)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (10)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (284)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (46)
- Harvard University (23)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (25)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (33)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (76)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (17)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (14)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (8)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Connecticut - USA (6)
- University of Michigan (152)
Resumo:
This perspective is a response to a taxonomic proposal by E. Mayr [“Two empires or three?” (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9720–9723]. Mayr has suggested that the now accepted classification of life into three primary domains, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya—originally proposed by myself and others—be abandoned in favor of the earlier Prokaryote–Eukaryote classification. Although the matter appears a taxonomic quibble, it is not that simple. At issue here are differing views as to the nature of biological classification, which are underlain by differing views as to what biology is and will be—matters of concern to all biologists.