Production, specificity, and functionality of monoclonal antibodies to specific peptide–major histocompatibility complex class II complexes formed by processing of exogenous protein

Several unanswered questions in T cell immunobiology relating to intracellular processing or in vivo antigen presentation could be approached if convenient, specific, and sensitive reagents were available for detecting the peptide–major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or class II ligands recognized by αβ T cell receptors. For this reason, we have developed a method using homogeneously loaded peptide–MHC class II complexes to generate and select specific mAb reactive with these structures using hen egg lysozyme (HEL) and I-Ak as a model system. mAbs specific for either HEL-(46–61)–Ak or HEL-(116–129)–Ak have been isolated. They cross-react with a small subset of I-Ak molecules loaded with self peptides but can nonetheless be used for flow cytometry, immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, and intracellular immunofluorescence to detect specific HEL peptide–MHC class II complexes formed by either peptide exposure or natural processing of native HEL. An example of the utility of these reagents is provided herein by using one of the anti-HEL-(46–61)–Ak specific mAbs to visualize intracellular compartments where I-Ak is loaded with HEL-derived peptides early after antigen administration. Other uses, especially for in vivo tracking of specific ligand-bearing antigen-presenting cells, are discussed.

Identification of two residues in MCM5 critical for the assembly of MCM complexes and Stat1-mediated transcription activation in response to IFN-γ

In response to IFN-γ, the latent cytoplasmic Stat1 (signal transducer and activator of transcription) proteins translocate into the nucleus and activate transcription. We showed previously that Stat1 recruits a group of nuclear proteins, among them MCM5 (minichromosome maintenance) and MCM3, for transcription activation. MCM5 directly interacts with the transcription activation domain (TAD) of Stat1 and enhances Stat1-mediated transcription activation. In this report, we identified two specific residues (R732, K734) in MCM5 that are required for the direct interaction between Stat1 and MCM5 both in vitro and in vivo. MCM5 containing mutations of R732/K734 did not enhance Stat1-mediated transcription activation in response to IFN-γ. In addition, it also failed to form complexes with other MCM proteins in vivo, suggesting that these two residues may be important for an interaction domain in MCM5. Furthermore, MCM5 bearing mutations in its ATPase and helicase domains did not enhance Stat1 activity. In vitro binding assays indicate that MCM3 does not interact directly with Stat1, suggesting that the presence of MCM3 in the group of Stat1TAD-interacting proteins is due to the association of MCM3 with MCM5. Finally, gel filtration analyses of nuclear extracts from INF-γ-treated cells demonstrate that there is a MCM5/3 subcomplex coeluting with Stat1. Together, these results strongly suggest that Stat1 recruits a MCM5/3 subcomplex through direct interaction with MCM5 in the process of IFN-γ-induced gene activation.