Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor’s ligand binding domains

The 2.8-Å crystal structure of the complex formed by estradiol and the human estrogen receptor-α ligand binding domain (hERαLBD) is described and compared with the recently reported structure of the progesterone complex of the human progesterone receptor ligand binding domain, as well as with similar structures of steroid/nuclear receptor LBDs solved elsewhere. The hormone-bound hERαLBD forms a distinctly different and probably more physiologically important dimer interface than its progesterone counterpart. A comparison of the specificity determinants of hormone binding reveals a common structural theme of mutually supported van der Waals and hydrogen-bonded interactions involving highly conserved residues. The previously suggested mechanism by which the estrogen receptor distinguishes estradiol’s unique 3-hydroxy group from the 3-keto function of most other steroids is now described in atomic detail. Mapping of mutagenesis results points to a coactivator-binding surface that includes the region around the “signature sequence” as well as helix 12, where the ligand-dependent conformation of the activation function 2 core is similar in all previously solved steroid/nuclear receptor LBDs. A peculiar crystal packing event displaces helix 12 in the hERαLBD reported here, suggesting a higher degree of dynamic variability than expected for this critical substructure.

Evolution of vertebrate steroid receptors from an ancestral estrogen receptor by ligand exploitation and serial genome expansions

The evolution of novelty in tightly integrated biological systems, such as hormones and their receptors, seems to challenge the theory of natural selection: it has not been clear how a new function for any one part (such as a ligand) can be selected for unless the other members of the system (e.g., a receptor) are already present. Here I show—based on identification and phylogenetic analysis of steroid receptors in basal vertebrates and reconstruction of the sequences and functional attributes of ancestral proteins—that the first steroid receptor was an estrogen receptor, followed by a progesterone receptor. Genome mapping and phylogenetic analyses indicate that the full complement of mammalian steroid receptors evolved from these ancient receptors by two large-scale genome expansions, one before the advent of jawed vertebrates and one after. Specific regulation of physiological processes by androgens and corticoids are relatively recent innovations that emerged after these duplications. These findings support a model of ligand exploitation in which the terminal ligand in a biosynthetic pathway is the first for which a receptor evolves; selection for this hormone also selects for the synthesis of intermediates despite the absence of receptors, and duplicated receptors then evolve affinity for these substances. In this way, novel hormone-receptor pairs are created, and an integrated system of increasing complexity elaborated. This model suggests that ligands for some “orphan” receptors may be found among intermediates in the synthesis of ligands for phylogenetically related receptors.

The extreme C terminus of progesterone receptor contains a transcriptional repressor domain that functions through a putative corepressor.

Binding of a hormone agonist to a steroid receptor leads to the dissociation of heat shock proteins, dimerization, specific DNA binding, and target gene activation. Although the progesterone antagonist RU486 can induce most of these events, it fails to activate human progesterone receptor (hPR)-dependent transcription. We have previously demonstrated that a conformational change is a key event leading to receptor activation. The major conformational distinction between hormone- and antihormone-bound receptors occurs within the C-terminal portion of the molecule. Furthermore, hPR mutants lacking the C terminus become transcriptionally active in the presence of RU486. These results suggest that the C terminus contains a repressor domain that inhibits the transcriptional activity of the RU486-bound hPR. In this study, we have defined a 12 amino acid (12AA) region in the C terminus of hPR that is necessary and sufficient for the repressor function when fused to the C-terminal truncated hPR or to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. Mutations in the 12AA domain (aa 917-928) generate an hPR that is active in the presence of RU486. Furthermore, overexpression of the 12AA peptide activates the RU486-bound wild-type hPR without affecting progesterone-dependent activation. These results suggest that association of the 12AA repressor region with a corepressor might inactivate hPR activity when it is bound to RU486. We propose that binding of a hormone agonist to the receptor changes its conformation in the ligand-binding domain so that association with coactivator is promoted and activation of target gene occurs.

16 alpha-substituted analogs of the antiprogestin RU486 induce a unique conformation in the human progesterone receptor resulting in mixed agonist activity.

Previously, we have shown that agonists and antagonists interact with distinct, though overlapping regions within the human progesterone receptor (hPR) resulting in the formation of structurally different complexes. Thus, a link was established between the structure of a ligand-receptor complex and biological activity. In this study, we have utilized a series of in vitro assays with which to study hPR pharmacology and have identified a third class of hPR ligands that induce a receptor conformation which is distinct from that induced by agonists or antagonists. Importantly, when assayed on PR-responsive target genes these compounds were shown to exhibit partial agonist activity; an activity that was influenced by cell context. Thus, as has been shown previously for estrogen receptor, the overall structure of the ligand-receptor complex is influenced by the nature of the ligand. It appears, therefore, that the observed differences in the activity of some PR and estrogen receptor ligands reflect the ability of the cellular transcription machinery to discriminate between the structurally different complexes that result following ligand interaction. These data support the increasingly favored hypothesis that different ligands can interact with different regions within the hormone binding domains of steroid hormone receptors resulting in different biologies.

Midcycle administration of a progesterone synthesis inhibitor prevents ovulation in primates.

Progesterone receptors appear in granuloma cells of preovulatory follicles after the midcycle gonadotropin surge, suggesting important local actions of progesterone during ovulation in primates. Steroid reduction and replacement during the gonadotropin surge in macaques was used to evaluate the role of progesterone in the ovulatory process. Animals received gonadotropins to induce development of multiple preovulatory follicles, followed by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (day 0) to promote oocyte (nuclear) maturation, ovulation, and follicular luteinization. On days 0-2, animals received no further treatment; a steroid synthesis inhibitor, trilostane (TRL); TRL + R5020; or TRL + dihydrotestosterone propionate (DHT). On day 3, ovulation was confirmed by counting ovulation sites and collecting oviductal oocytes. The meiotic status of oviductal and remaining follicular oocytes was evaluated. Peak serum estradiol levels, the total number of large follicles, and baseline serum progesterone levels at the time of hCG administration were similar in all animals. Ovulation sites and oviductal oocytes were routinely observed in controls. Ovulation was abolished in TRL. Progestin, but not androgen, replacement restored ovulation. Relative to controls, progesterone production was impaired for the first 6 days post-hCG in TRL, TRL + R5020, and TRL + DHT. Thereafter, progesterone remained low in TRL but recovered to control levels with progestin and androgen replacement. Similar percentages of mature (metaphase II) oocytes were collected among groups. Thus, steroid reduction during the gonadotropin surge inhibited ovulation and luteinization, but not reinitiation of oocyte meiotic maturation, in the primate follicle. The data are consistent with a local receptor-mediated role for progesterone in the ovulatory process.

A progesterone metabolite stimulates the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone from GT1-1 hypothalamic neurons via the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor.

The reduced progesterone metabolite tetrahydroprogesterone (3 alpha-hydroxy-5 alpha-pregnan-20-one; 3 alpha,5 alpha-THP) is a positive modulator of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor. Experiments performed in vitro with hypothalamic fragments have previously shown that GABA could modulate the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Using GT1-1 immortalized GnRH neurons, we investigated the role of GABAA receptor ligands, including 3 alpha,5 alpha-THP, on the release of GnRH. We first characterized the GABAA receptors expressed by these neurons. [3H]Muscimol, but not [3H]flunitrazepam, bound with high affinity to GT1-1 cell membranes (Kd = 10.9 +/- 0.3 nM; Bmax = 979 +/- 12 fmol/mg of protein), and [3H]muscimol binding was enhanced by 3 alpha,5 alpha-THP. mRNAs encoding the alpha 1 and beta 3 subunits of the GABAA receptor were detected by the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. In agreement with binding data, the benzodiazepine-binding gamma subunit mRNA was absent. GnRH release studies showed a dose-related stimulating action of muscimol. 3 alpha,5 alpha-THP not only modulated muscimol-induced secretion but also stimulated GnRH release when administered alone. Bicuculline and picrotoxin blocked the effects of 3 alpha,5 alpha-THP and muscimol. Finally, we observed that GT1-1 neurons convert progesterone to 3 alpha,5 alpha-THP. We propose that progesterone may increase the release of GnRH by a membrane mechanism, via its reduced metabolite 3 alpha,5 alpha-THP acting at the GABAA receptor.

Neurosteroids, via sigma receptors, modulate the [3H]norepinephrine release evoked by N-methyl-D-aspartate in the rat hippocampus.

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA, 200 microM) evokes the release of [3H]norepinephrine ([3H]NE) from preloaded hippocampal slices. This effect is potentiated by dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA S), whereas it is inhibited by pregnenolone sulfate (PREG S) and the high-affinity sigma inverse agonist 1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine, at concentrations of > or = 100 nM. Neither 3 alpha-hydroxy-5 alpha-pregnan-20-one nor its sulfate ester modified NMDA-evoked [3H]NE overflow. The sigma antagonists haloperidol and 1-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-ethyl]-4-methylpiperazine, although inactive by themselves, completely prevented the effects of DHEA S, PREG S, and 1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine on NMDA-evoked [3H]NE release. Progesterone (100 nM) mimicked the antagonistic effect of haloperidol and 1-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-4-methyl-piperazine. These results indicate that the tested steroid sulfate esters differentially affected the NMDA response in vitro and suggest that DHEA S acts as a sigma agonist, that PREG S acts as a sigma inverse agonist, and that progesterone may act as a sigma antagonist. Pertussis toxin, which inactivates the Gi/o types of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (Gi/o protein) function, suppresses both effects of DHEA S and PREG S. Since sigma 1 but not sigma 2 receptors are coupled to Gi/o proteins, the present results suggest that DHEA S and PREG S control the NMDA response via sigma 1 receptors.