Bacteriophage T4 gene 41 helicase and gene 59 helicase-loading protein: A versatile couple with roles in replication and recombination

Bacteriophage T4 uses two modes of replication initiation: origin-dependent replication early in infection and recombination-dependent replication at later times. The same relatively simple complex of T4 replication proteins is responsible for both modes of DNA synthesis. Thus the mechanism for loading the T4 41 helicase must be versatile enough to allow it to be loaded on R loops created by transcription at several origins, on D loops created by recombination, and on stalled replication forks. T4 59 helicase-loading protein is a small, basic, almost completely α-helical protein whose N-terminal domain has structural similarity to high mobility group family proteins. In this paper we review recent evidence that 59 protein recognizes specific structures rather than specific sequences. It binds and loads the helicase on replication forks and on three- and four-stranded (Holliday junction) recombination structures, without sequence specificity. We summarize our experiments showing that purified T4 enzymes catalyze complete unidirectional replication of a plasmid containing the T4 ori(uvsY) origin, with a preformed R loop at the position of the R loop identified at this origin in vivo. This replication depends on the 41 helicase and is strongly stimulated by 59 protein. Moreover, the helicase-loading protein helps to coordinate leading and lagging strand synthesis by blocking replication on the ori(uvsY) R loop plasmid until the helicase is loaded. The T4 enzymes also can replicate plasmids with R loops that do not have a T4 origin sequence, but only if the R loops are within an easily unwound DNA sequence.

A Polymer Model for the Structural Organization of Chromatin Loops and Minibands in Interphase Chromosomes

A quantitative model of interphase chromosome higher-order structure is presented based on the isochore model of the genome and results obtained in the field of copolymer research. G1 chromosomes are approximated in the model as multiblock copolymers of the 30-nm chromatin fiber, which alternately contain two types of 0.5- to 1-Mbp blocks (R and G minibands) differing in GC content and DNA-bound proteins. A G1 chromosome forms a single-chain string of loop clusters (micelles), with each loop ∼1–2 Mbp in size. The number of ∼20 loops per micelle was estimated from the dependence of geometrical versus genomic distances between two points on a G1 chromosome. The greater degree of chromatin extension in R versus G minibands and a difference in the replication time for these minibands (early S phase for R versus late S phase for G) are explained in this model as a result of the location of R minibands at micelle cores and G minibands at loop apices. The estimated number of micelles per nucleus is close to the observed number of replication clusters at the onset of S phase. A relationship between chromosomal and nuclear sizes for several types of higher eukaryotic cells (insects, plants, and mammals) is well described through the micelle structure of interphase chromosomes. For yeast cells, this relationship is described by a linear coil configuration of chromosomes.

The structure of the human βII-tryptase tetramer: Fo(u)r better or worse

Tryptases, the predominant serine proteinases of human mast cells, have recently been implicated as mediators in the pathogenesis of allergic and inflammatory conditions, most notably asthma. Their distinguishing features, their activity as a heparin-stabilized tetramer and resistance to most proteinaceous inhibitors, are perfectly explained by the 3-Å crystal structure of human βII-tryptase in complex with 4-amidinophenylpyruvic acid. The tetramer consists of four quasiequivalent monomers arranged in a flat frame-like structure. The active centers are directed toward a central pore whose narrow openings of approximately 40 Å × 15 Å govern the interaction with macromolecular substrates and inhibitors. The tryptase monomer exhibits the overall fold of trypsin-like serine proteinases but differs considerably in the conformation of six surface loops arranged around the active site. These loops border and shape the active site cleft to a large extent and form all contacts with neighboring monomers via two distinct interfaces. The smaller of these interfaces, which is exclusively hydrophobic, can be stabilized by the binding of heparin chains to elongated patches of positively charged residues on adjacent monomers or, alternatively, by high salt concentrations in vitro. On tetramer dissociation, the monomers are likely to undergo transformation into a zymogen-like conformation that is favored and stabilized by intramonomer interactions. The structure thus provides an improved understanding of the unique properties of the biologically active tryptase tetramer in solution and will be an incentive for the rational design of mono- and multifunctional tryptase inhibitors.

DNA loops induced by cooperative binding of transcriptional activator proteins and preinitiation complexes.

DNA conformational changes are essential for the assembly of multiprotein complexes that contact several DNA sequence elements. An approach based on atomic force microscopy was chosen to visualize specific protein-DNA interactions occurring on eukaryotic class II nuclear gene promoters. Here we report that binding of the transcription regulatory protein Jun to linearized plasmid DNA containing the consensus AP-1 binding site upstream of a class II gene promoter leads to bending of the DNA template. This binding of Jun was found to be essential for the formation of preinitiation complexes (PICs). The cooperative binding of Jun and PIC led to looping of DNA at the protein binding sites. These loops were not seen in the absence of either PICs, Jun, or the AP-1 binding site, suggesting a direct interaction between DNA-bound Jun homodimers and proteins bound to the core promoter. This direct visualization of functional transcriptional complexes confirms the theoretical predictions for the mode of gene regulation by trans-activating proteins.