Manufacturing DNA microarrays of high spot homogeneity and reduced background signal

Analyses on DNA microarrays depend considerably on spot quality and a low background signal of the glass support. By using betaine as an additive to a spotting solution made of saline sodium citrate, both the binding efficiency of spotted PCR products and the homogeneity of the DNA spots is improved significantly on aminated surfaces such as glass slides coated with the widely used poly-l-lysine or aminosilane. In addition, non-specific background signal is markedly diminished. Concomitantly, during the arraying procedure, the betaine reduces evaporation from the microtitre dish wells, which hold the PCR products. Subsequent blocking of the chip surface with succinic anhydride was improved considerably in the presence of the non-polar, non-aqueous solvent 1,2-dichloroethane and the acylating catalyst N-methylimidazole. This procedure prevents the overall background signal that occurs with the frequently applied aqueous solvent 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone in borate buffer because of DNA that re-dissolves from spots during the blocking process, only to bind again across the entire glass surface.

A general additive distance with time-reversibility and rate variation among nucleotide sites.

As additivity is a very useful property for a distance measure, a general additive distance is proposed under the stationary time-reversible (SR) model of nucleotide substitution or, more generally, under the stationary, time-reversible, and rate variable (SRV) model, which allows rate variation among nucleotide sites. A method for estimating the mean distance and the sampling variance is developed. In addition, a method is developed for estimating the variance-covariance matrix of distances, which is useful for the statistical test of phylogenies and molecular clocks. Computer simulation shows (i) if the sequences are longer than, say, 1000 bp, the SR method is preferable to simpler methods; (ii) the SR method is robust against deviations from time-reversibility; (iii) when the rate varies among sites, the SRV method is much better than the SR method because the distance is seriously underestimated by the SR method; and (iv) our method for estimating the sampling variance is accurate for sequences longer than 500 bp. Finally, a test is constructed for testing whether DNA evolution follows a general Markovian model.