Azotobacter vinelandii NIFL is a flavoprotein that modulates transcriptional activation of nitrogen-fixation genes via a redox-sensitive switch.

The NIFL regulatory protein controls transcriptional activation of nitrogen fixation (nif) genes in Azotobacter vinelandii by direct interaction with the enhancer binding protein NIFA. Modulation of NIFA activity by NIFL, in vivo occurs in response to external oxygen concentration or the level of fixed nitrogen. Spectral features of purified NIFL and chromatographic analysis indicate that it is a flavoprotein with FAD as the prosthetic group, which undergoes reduction in the presence of sodium dithionite. Under anaerobic conditions, the oxidized form of NIFL inhibits transcriptional activation by NIFA in vitro, and this inhibition is reversed when NIFL is in the reduced form. Hence NIFL is a redox-sensitive regulatory protein and may represent a type of flavoprotein in which electron transfer is not coupled to an obvious catalytic activity. In addition to its ability to act as a redox sensor, the activity of NIFL is also responsive to adenosine nucleotides, particularly ADP. This response overrides the influence of redox status on NIFL and is also observed with refolded NIFL apoprotein, which lacks the flavin moiety. These observations suggest that both energy and redox status are important determinants of nif gene regulation in vivo.

The amino-terminal domain of the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR is a specific intramolecular repressor.

The mechanism under which the signal-reception amino-terminal portion (A domain) of the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR controls the activity of the regulator has been investigated through complementation tests in vivo, in which the various protein segments were produced as independent polypeptides. Separate expression of the A domain repressed the otherwise constitutive activity of a truncated derivative of XylR deleted of its A domain (XylR delta A). Such inhibition was not released by m-xylene, the natural inducer of the system. Repression caused by the A domain was specific for XylR because it did not affect activation of the sigma 54 promoter PnifH by a derivative of its cognate regulator, NifA, deleted of its own A domain. The A domain was also unable to repress the activity of a NifA-XylR hybrid protein resulting from fusing two-thirds of the central domain of NifA to the carboxyl-terminal third of XylR, which includes its DNA-binding domain. The inhibitory effect caused by the A domain of XylR on XylR delta A seems, therefore, to result from specific interactions in trans between the two truncated proteins and not from mere hindering of an activating surface.