Interaction between the phage HK022 Nun protein and the nut RNA of phage lambda.

The nun gene product of prophage HK022 excludes phage lambda infection by blocking the expression of genes downstream from the lambda nut sequence. The Nun protein functions both by competing with lambda N transcription-antitermination protein and by actively inducing transcription termination on the lambda chromosome. We demonstrate that Nun binds directly to a stem-loop structure within nut RNA, boxB, which is also the target for the N antiterminator. The two proteins show comparable affinities for boxB and they compete with each other. Their interactions with boxB are similar, as shown by RNase protection experiments, NMR spectroscopy, and analysis of boxB mutants. Each protein binds the 5' strand of the boxB stem and the adjacent loop. The stem does not melt upon the binding of Nun or N, as the 3' strand remains sensitive to a double-strand-specific RNase. The binding of RNA partially protects Nun from proteolysis and changes its NMR spectra. Evidently, although Nun and N bind to the same surface of boxB RNA, their respective complexes interact differently with RNA polymerase, inducing transcription termination or antitermination, respectively.

Bacteriophage lambda N protein alone can induce transcription antitermination in vitro.

Specific and processive antitermination by bacteriophage lambda N protein in vivo and in vitro requires the participation of a large number of Escherichia coli proteins (Nus factors), as well as an RNA hairpin (boxB) within the nut site of the nascent transcript. In this study we show that efficient, though nonprocessive, antitermination can be induced by large concentrations of N alone, even in the absence of a nut site. By adding back individual components of the system, we also show that N with nut+ nascent RNA is much more effective in antitermination than is N alone. This effect is abolished if N is competed away from the nut+ RNA by adding, in trans, an excess of boxB RNA. The addition of NusA makes antitermination by the N-nut+ complex yet more effective. This NusA-dependent increase in antitermination is lost when delta nut transcripts are used. These results suggest the formation of a specific boxB RNA-N-NusA complex within the transcription complex. By assuming an equilibrium model, we estimate a binding constant of 5 x 10(6) M-1 for the interaction of N alone with the transcription complex. This value can be used to estimate a characteristic dissociation time of N from the complex that is comparable to the dwell time of the complex at an average template position, thus explaining the nonprocessivity of the antitermination effect induced by N alone. On this basis, the effective dissociation rate of N should be approximately 1000-fold slower from the minimally processive (100-600 bp) N-NusA-nut+ transcription complex and approximately 10(5)-fold slower from the maximally processive (thousands of base pairs) complex containing all of the components of the in vivo N-dependent antitermination system.

Bipartite function of a small RNA hairpin in transcription antitermination in bacteriophage lambda.

Transcription of downstream genes in the early operons of phage lambda requires a promoter-proximal element known as nut. This site acts in cis in the form of RNA to assemble a transcription antitermination complex which is composed of lambda N protein and at least four host factors. The nut-site RNA contains a small stem-loop structure called boxB. Here, we show that boxB RNA binds to N protein with high affinity and specificity. While N binding is confined to the 5' subdomain of the stem-loop, specific N recognition relies on both an intact stem-loop structure and two critical nucleotides in the pentamer loop. Substitutions of these nucleotides affect both N binding and antitermination. Remarkably, substitutions of other loop nucleotides also diminish antitermination in vivo, yet they have no detectable effect on N binding in vitro. These 3' loop mutants fail to support antitermination in a minimal system with RNA polymerase (RNAP), N, and the host factor NusA. Furthermore, the ability of NusA to stimulate the formation of the RNAP-boxB-N complex is diminished with these mutants. Hence, we suggest that boxB RNA performs two critical functions in antitermination. First, boxB binds to N and secures it near RNAP to enhance their interaction, presumably by increasing the local concentration of N. Second, boxB cooperates with NusA, most likely to bring N and RNAP in close contact and transform RNAP to the termination-resistant state.