Broken symmetry and strangeness of the semiconductor impurity band metal-insulator transition

The filamentary model of the metal-insulator transition in randomly doped semiconductor impurity bands is geometrically equivalent to similar models for continuous transitions in dilute antiferromagnets and even to the λ transition in liquid He, but the critical behaviors are different. The origin of these differences lies in two factors: quantum statistics and the presence of long range Coulomb forces on both sides of the transition in the electrical case. In the latter case, in addition to the main transition, there are two satellite transitions associated with disappearance of the filamentary structure in both insulating and metallic phases. These two satellite transitions were first identified by Fritzsche in 1958, and their physical origin is explained here in geometrical and topological terms that facilitate calculation of critical exponents.

Positional enhancer-blocking activity of the chicken β-globin insulator in transiently transfected cells

It is thought that insulators demarcate transcriptionally and structurally independent chromatin domains. Insulators are detected by their ability to block enhancer–promoter interactions in a directional manner, and protect a transgene from position effects. Most studies are performed in stably transformed cells or organisms. Here we analyze the enhancer-blocking activity of the chicken β-globin insulator in transient transfection experiments in both erythroid and nonerythroid cell lines. We show that four tandem copies of a 90-bp fragment of this insulator were able to block an enhancer in these experiments. In circular plasmids, placement on either side of the enhancer reduced activity, but when the plasmid was linearized, the enhancer-blocking activity was observed only when the insulator was placed between the promoter and the enhancer. These observations are consistent with the position-dependent enhancer-blocking activity of the insulator observed in stable transformation experiments.

Two modes of transvection: Enhancer action in trans and bypass of a chromatin insulator in cis

Ed Lewis introduced the term “transvection” in 1954 to describe mechanisms that can cause the expression of a gene to be sensitive to the proximity of its homologue. Transvection since has been reported at an increasing number of loci in Drosophila, where homologous chromosomes are paired in somatic tissues, as well as at loci in other organisms. At the Drosophila yellow gene, transvection can explain intragenic complementation involving the yellow2 allele (y2). Here, transvection was proposed to occur by enhancers of one allele acting in trans on the promoter of a paired homologue. In this report, we describe two yellow alleles that strengthen this model and reveal an unexpected, second mechanism for transvection. Data suggest that, in addition to enhancer action in trans, transvection can occur by enhancer bypass of a chromatin insulator in cis. We propose that bypass results from the topology of paired genes. Finally, transvection at yellow can occur in genotypes not involving y2, implying that it is a feature of yellow itself and not an attribute of one particular allele.

Genetic and molecular analysis of the gypsy chromatin insulator of Drosophila.

Boundary or insulator elements set up independent territories of gene activity by establishing higher order domains of chromatin structure. The gypsy retrotransposon of Drosophila contains an insulator element that represses enhancer-promoter interactions and is responsible for the mutant phenotypes caused by insertion of this element. The gypsy insulator inhibits the interaction of promoter-distal enhancers with the transcription complex without affecting the functionality of promoter-proximal enhancers; in addition, these sequences can buffer a transgene from chromosomal position effects. Two proteins have been identified that bind gypsy insulator sequences and are responsible for their effects on transcription. The suppressor of Hairy-wing [su(Hw)] protein affects enhancer function both upstream and downstream of its binding site by causing a silencing effect similar to that of heterochromatin. The modifier of mdg4 [mod(mdg4)] protein interacts with su(Hw) to transform this bi-directional repression into the polar effect characteristic of insulators. These effects seem to be modulated by changes in chromatin structure.