Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole–dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution

Fast transverse relaxation of 1H, 15N, and 13C by dipole-dipole coupling (DD) and chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) modulated by rotational molecular motions has a dominant impact on the size limit for biomacromolecular structures that can be studied by NMR spectroscopy in solution. Transverse relaxation-optimized spectroscopy (TROSY) is an approach for suppression of transverse relaxation in multidimensional NMR experiments, which is based on constructive use of interference between DD coupling and CSA. For example, a TROSY-type two-dimensional 1H,15N-correlation experiment with a uniformly 15N-labeled protein in a DNA complex of molecular mass 17 kDa at a 1H frequency of 750 MHz showed that 15N relaxation during 15N chemical shift evolution and 1HN relaxation during signal acquisition both are significantly reduced by mutual compensation of the DD and CSA interactions. The reduction of the linewidths when compared with a conventional two-dimensional 1H,15N-correlation experiment was 60% and 40%, respectively, and the residual linewidths were 5 Hz for 15N and 15 Hz for 1HN at 4°C. Because the ratio of the DD and CSA relaxation rates is nearly independent of the molecular size, a similar percentagewise reduction of the overall transverse relaxation rates is expected for larger proteins. For a 15N-labeled protein of 150 kDa at 750 MHz and 20°C one predicts residual linewidths of 10 Hz for 15N and 45 Hz for 1HN, and for the corresponding uniformly 15N,2H-labeled protein the residual linewidths are predicted to be smaller than 5 Hz and 15 Hz, respectively. The TROSY principle should benefit a variety of multidimensional solution NMR experiments, especially with future use of yet somewhat higher polarizing magnetic fields than are presently available, and thus largely eliminate one of the key factors that limit work with larger molecules.

A sensory brain map for each behavior?

Multiple brain maps are commonly found in virtually every vertebrate sensory system. Although their functional significance is generally relatively little understood, they seem to specialize in processing distinct sensory parameters. Nevertheless, to yield the stimulus features that ultimately elicit the adaptive behavior, it appears that information streams have to be combined across maps. Results from current lesion experiments in the electrosensory system, however, suggest an alternative possibility. Inactivations of different maps of the first-order electrosensory nucleus in electric fish, the electrosensory lateral line lobe, resulted in markedly different behavioral deficits. The centromedial map is both necessary and sufficient for a particular electrolocation behavior, the jamming avoidance response, whereas it does not affect the communicative response to external electric signals. Conversely, the lateral map does not affect the jamming avoidance response but is necessary and sufficient to evoke communication behavior. Because the premotor pathways controlling the two behaviors in these fish appear to be separated as well, this system illustrates that sensory–motor control of different behaviors can occur in strictly segregated channels from the sensory input of the brain all through to its motor output. This might reflect an early evolutionary stage where multiplication of brain maps can satisfy the demand on processing a wider range of sensory signals ensuing from an enlarged behavioral repertoire, and bridging across maps is not yet required.