Evidence for the recent horizontal transfer of long terminal repeat retrotransposon

The evolutionary dynamics existing between transposable elements (TEs) and their host genomes have been likened to an “arms race.” The selfish drive of TEs to replicate, in turn, elicits the evolution of host-mediated regulatory mechanisms aimed at repressing transpositional activity. It has been postulated that horizontal (cross-species) transfer may be one effective strategy by which TEs and other selfish genes can escape host-mediated silencing mechanisms over evolutionary time; however, to date, the most definitive evidence that TEs horizontally transfer between species has been limited to class II or DNA-type elements. Evidence that the more numerous and widely distributed retroelements may also be horizontally transferred between species has been more ambiguous. In this paper, we report definitive evidence for a recent horizontal transfer of the copia long terminal repeat retrotransposon between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila willistoni.

Naturally occurring variation in copia expression is due to both element (cis) and host (trans) regulatory variation.

Significant differences in levels of copia [Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon] expression exist among six species representing the Drosophila melanogaster species complex (D. melanogaster, Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila yakuba, and Drosophila erecta) and a more distantly related species (Drosophila willistoni). These differences in expression are correlated with major size variation mapping to putative regulatory regions of the copia 5' LTR and adjacent untranslated leader region (ULR). Sequence analysis indicates that these size variants were derived from a series of regional duplication events. The ability of the copia LTR-ULR size variants to drive expression of a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene was tested in each of the seven species. The results indicate that both element-encoded (cis) and host-genome-encoded (trans) genetic differences are responsible for the variability in copia expression within and between Drosophila species. This finding indicates that models purporting to explain the dynamics and distribution of retrotransposons in natural populations must consider the potential impact of both element-encoded and host-genome-encoded regulatory variation to be valid. We propose that interelement selection among retrotransposons may provide a molecular drive mechanism for the evolution of eukaryotic enhancers which can be subsequently distributed throughout the genome by retrotransposition.