1 resultado para Ernst, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, 1497-1546.
em National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (15)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (19)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (9)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (6)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (17)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (46)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (20)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (22)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (7)
- Harvard University (9)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (41)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (41)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (46)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (40)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Michigan (387)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
This perspective is a response to a taxonomic proposal by E. Mayr [“Two empires or three?” (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9720–9723]. Mayr has suggested that the now accepted classification of life into three primary domains, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya—originally proposed by myself and others—be abandoned in favor of the earlier Prokaryote–Eukaryote classification. Although the matter appears a taxonomic quibble, it is not that simple. At issue here are differing views as to the nature of biological classification, which are underlain by differing views as to what biology is and will be—matters of concern to all biologists.