1 resultado para Editors
em National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (74)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (48)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (18)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (73)
- CUNY Academic Works (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (5)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (17)
- Georgian Library Association, Georgia (1)
- Harvard University (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (40)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (223)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (79)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (28)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (7)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (8)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (38)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (6)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (21)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (58)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (22)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (6)
Resumo:
To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis and interpretation. That goal can only be achieved through complete transparency from authors. Despite several decades of educational efforts, the reporting of RCTs needs improvement. Investigators and editors developed the original CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to help authors improve reporting by using a checklist and flow diagram. The revised CONSORT statement presented in this paper incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement.