Control of fertilization-independent endosperm development by the MEDEA polycomb gene in Arabidopsis

Higher plant reproduction is unique because two cells are fertilized in the haploid female gametophyte. Egg and sperm nuclei fuse to form the embryo. A second sperm nucleus fuses with the central cell nucleus that replicates to generate the endosperm, a tissue that supports embryo development. To understand mechanisms that initiate reproduction, we isolated a mutation in Arabidopsis, f644, that allows for replication of the central cell and subsequent endosperm development without fertilization. When mutant f644 egg and central cells are fertilized by wild-type sperm, embryo development is inhibited, and endosperm is overproduced. By using a map-based strategy, we cloned and sequenced the F644 gene and showed that it encodes a SET-domain polycomb protein. Subsequently, we found that F644 is identical to MEDEA (MEA), a gene whose maternal-derived allele is required for embryogenesis [Grossniklaus, U., Vielle-Calzada, J.-P., Hoeppner, M. A. & Gagliano, W. B. (1998) Science 280, 446–450]. Together, these results reveal functions for plant polycomb proteins in the suppression of central cell proliferation and endosperm development. We discuss models to explain how polycomb proteins function to suppress endosperm and promote embryo development.

In Vitro Reconstitution of Electron Transport from Glucose-6-Phosphate and NADPH to Nitrite1

An NADPH-dependent NO2−-reducing system was reconstituted in vitro using ferredoxin (Fd) NADP+ oxidoreductase (FNR), Fd, and nitrite reductase (NiR) from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. NO2− reduction was dependent on all protein components and was operated under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. NO2− reduction by this in vitro pathway was inhibited up to 63% by 1 mm NADP+. NADP+ did not affect either methyl viologen-NiR or Fd-NiR activity, indicating that inhibition was mediated through FNR. When NADPH was replaced with a glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH)-dependent NADPH-generating system, rates of NO2− reduction reached approximately 10 times that of the NADPH-dependent system. G6PDH could be replaced by either 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase or isocitrate dehydrogenase, indicating that G6PDH functioned to: (a) regenerate NADPH to support NO2− reduction and (b) consume NADP+, releasing FNR from NADP+ inhibition. These results demonstrate the ability of FNR to facilitate the transfer of reducing power from NADPH to Fd in the direction opposite to that which occurs in photosynthesis. The rate of G6PDH-dependent NO2− reduction observed in vitro is capable of accounting for the observed rates of dark NO3− assimilation by C. reinhardtii.

Tomato Fructokinases Exhibit Differential Expression and Substrate Regulation1

Two divergent genes encoding fructokinase, Frk1 and Frk2, have been previously shown to be expressed in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and have now been further characterized with regard to their spatial expression and the enzymic properties of the encoded proteins. Frk1 and Frk2 mRNA levels were coordinately induced by exogenous sugar, indicating that both belong to the growing class of sugar-regulated genes. However, in situ hybridization indicated that Frk1 and Frk2 were expressed in a spatially distinct manner, with Frk2 mRNA primarily localized in cells of the fruit pericarp, which store starch, and Frk1 mRNA distributed ubiquitously in pericarp tissue. To evaluate the biochemical characteristics of the products of the Frk1 and Frk2 genes, each cDNA was expressed in a mutant yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) line defective in hexose phosphorylation and unable to grow on glucose or fructose (Fru). Both Frk1 and Frk2 proteins expressed in yeast conferred the ability to grow on Fru and exhibited fructokinase activity in vitro. Although both Frk1 and Frk2 both utilized Fru as a substrate, only Frk2 activity was inhibited at high Fru concentrations. These results indicate that Frk2 can be distinguished from Frk1 by its sensitivity to substrate inhibition and by its temporal and spatial pattern of expression, which suggests that it plays a primary role in plant cells specialized for starch storage.