Flexibility of the Kir6.2 inward rectifier K+ channel pore

Interactions of sulfhydryl reagents with introduced cysteines in the pore-forming (Kir6.2) subunits of the KATP channel were examined. 2-Aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA+) failed to modify Cd2+-insensitive control-Kir6.2 channels, but rapidly and irreversibly modified Kir6.2[L164C] (L164C) channels. Although a single Cd2+ ion is coordinated by L164C, four MTSEA+ “hits” can occur, each sequentially reducing the single-channel current. A dimeric fusion of control-Kir6.2 and L164C subunits generates Cd2+-insensitive channels, confirming that at least three cysteines are required for coordination, but MTSEA+ modification of the dimer occurs in two hits. L164C channels were not modified by bromotrimethyl ammoniumbimane (qBBr+), even though qBBr+ caused voltage-dependent block (as opposed to modification) that was comparable to that of MTSEA+ or 3-(triethylammonium)propyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSPTrEA+), implying that qBBr+ can also enter the inner cavity but does not modify L164C residues. The Kir channel pore structure was modeled by homology with the KcsA crystal structure. A stable conformation optimally places the four L164C side chains for coordination of a single Cd2+ ion. Modification of these cysteines by up to four MTSEA+ (or three MTSPTrEA+, or two qBBr+) does not require widening of the cavity to accommodate the derivatives within it. However, like the KcsA crystal structure, the energy-minimized model shows a narrowing at the inner entrance, and in the Kir6.2 model this narrowing excludes all ions. To allow entry of ions as large as MTSPTrEA+ or qBBr+, the entrance must widen to >8 Å, but this widening is readily accomplished by minimal M2 helix motion and side-chain rearrangement.

A quantitative model for membrane fusion based on low-energy intermediates

The energetics of a fusion pathway is considered, starting from the contact site where two apposed membranes each locally protrude (as “nipples”) toward each other. The equilibrium distance between the tips of the two nipples is determined by a balance of physical forces: repulsion caused by hydration and attraction generated by fusion proteins. The energy to create the initial stalk, caused by bending of cis monolayer leaflets, is much less when the stalk forms between nipples rather than parallel flat membranes. The stalk cannot, however, expand by bending deformations alone, because this would necessitate the creation of a hydrophobic void of prohibitively high energy. But small movements of the lipids out of the plane of their monolayers allow transformation of the stalk into a modified stalk. This intermediate, not previously considered, is a low-energy structure that can reconfigure into a fusion pore via an additional intermediate, the prepore. The lipids of this latter structure are oriented as in a fusion pore, but the bilayer is locally compressed. All membrane rearrangements occur in a discrete local region without creation of an extended hemifusion diaphragm. Importantly, all steps of the proposed pathway are energetically feasible.