Polyandrous females discriminate against previous mates

In most animal species, particularly those in which females engage in polyandry, mate choice is a sequential process in which a female must choose to mate or not to mate with each male encountered. Although a number of theoretical and empirical investigations have examined the effects of sequential mate choice on the operation of sexual selection, how females respond to solicitation by previous mates has received little attention. Here, we report the results of a study carried out on the polyandrous pseudoscorpion, Cordylochernes scorpioides, that assessed the sexual receptivity of once-mated females presented after a lapse of 1.5 hr or 48 hr with either their first mate or a different male. Females exhibited a high level of receptivity to new males, irrespective of intermating interval. By contrast, time between matings exerted a strong effect on female receptivity to previous mates. After a lapse of 48 hr, females did not differ significantly in their receptivity toward previous mates and different males, whereas at 1.5 hr after first mating, females were almost invariably unreceptive to males from whom they had previously accepted sperm. This result could not be attributed to male size or mating experience or to male sexual receptivity. Indeed, males were as willing to transfer sperm to a previous mate as they were to a new female. This difference between males and females in their propensity to remate with the same individual may reflect a conflict between the sexes, with males seeking to minimize postcopulatory sexual selection and females actively keeping open the opportunity for sperm competition and female choice of sperm by discriminating against previous mates.

Dual-function regulators: the cAMP receptor protein and the CytR regulator can act either to repress or to activate transcription depending on the context.

Studies of gene regulation have revealed that several transcriptional regulators can switch between activator and repressor depending upon both the promoter and the cellular context. A relatively simple prokaryotic example is illustrated by the Escherichia coli CytR regulon. In this system, the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) assists the binding of RNA polymerase as well as a specific negative regulator, CytR. Thus, CRP functions either as an activator or as a corepressor. Here we show that, depending on promoter architecture, the CRP/CytR nucleoprotein complex has opposite effects on transcription. When acting from a site close to the DNA target for RNA polymerase, CytR interacts with CRP to repress transcription, whereas an interaction with CRP from appropriately positioned upstream binding sites can result in formation of a huge preinitiation complex and transcriptional activation. Based on recent results about CRP-mediated regulation of transcription initiation and the finding that CRP possesses discrete surface-exposed patches for protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase and CytR, a molecular model for this dual regulation is discussed.

DAF-16 recruits the CREB-binding protein coactivator complex to the insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 promoter in HepG2 cells

Insulin negatively regulates expression of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) gene by means of an insulin-responsive element (IRE) that also contributes to glucocorticoid stimulation of this gene. We find that the Caenorhabditis elegans protein DAF-16 binds the IGFBP-1⋅IRE with specificity similar to that of the forkhead (FKH) factor(s) that act both to enhance glucocorticoid responsiveness and to mediate the negative effect of insulin at this site. In HepG2 cells, DAF-16 and its mammalian homologs, FKHR, FKHRL1, and AFX, activate transcription through the IGFBP-1⋅IRE; this effect is inhibited by the viral oncoprotein E1A, but not by mutants of E1A that fail to interact with the coactivator p300/CREB-binding protein (CBP). We show that DAF-16 and FKHR can interact with both the KIX and E1A/SRC interaction domains of p300/CBP, as well as the steroid receptor coactivator (SRC). A C-terminal deletion mutant of DAF-16 that is nonfunctional in C. elegans fails to bind the KIX domain of CBP, fails to activate transcription through the IGFBP-1⋅IRE, and inhibits activation of the IGFBP-1 promoter by glucocorticoids. Thus, the interaction of DAF-16 homologs with the KIX domain of CBP is essential to basal and glucocorticoid-stimulated transactivation. Although AFX interacts with the KIX domain of CBP, it does not interact with SRC and does not respond to glucocorticoids or insulin. Thus, we conclude that DAF-16 and FKHR act as accessory factors to the glucocorticoid response, by recruiting the p300/CBP/SRC coactivator complex to an FKH factor site in the IGFBP-1 promoter, which allows the cell to integrate the effects of glucocorticoids and insulin on genes that carry this site.

How Escherichia coli can bias the results of molecular cloning: Preferential selection of defective genomes of hepatitis C virus during the cloning procedure

Cloned PCR products containing hepatitis C virus (HCV) genomic fragments have been used for analyses of HCV genomic heterogeneity and protein expression. These studies assume that the clones derived are representative of the entire virus population and that subsets are not inadvertently selected. The aim of the present study was to express HCV structural proteins. However, we found that there was a strong cloning selection for defective genomes and that most clones generated initially were incapable of expressing the HCV proteins. The HCV structural region (C-E1-E2-p7) was directly amplified by long reverse transcription–PCR from the plasma of an HCV-infected patient or from a control plasmid containing a viable full-length cDNA of HCV derived from the same patient but cloned in a different vector. The PCR products were cloned into a mammalian expression vector, amplified in Escherichia coli, and tested for their ability to produce HCV structural proteins. Twenty randomly picked clones derived from the HCV-infected patient all contained nucleotide mutations leading to absence or truncation of the expected HCV products. Of 25 clones derived from the control plasmid, only 8% were fully functional for polyprotein synthesis. The insertion of extra nucleotides in the region just upstream of the start codon of the HCV insert led to a statistically significant increase in the number of fully functional clones derived from the patient (42%) and from the control plasmid (72–92%). Nonrandom selection of clones during the cloning procedure has enormous implications for the study of viral heterogeneity, because it can produce a false spectrum of genomic diversity. It can also be an impediment to the construction of infectious viral clones.

Dominant loss of responsiveness to sweet and bitter compounds caused by a single mutation in α-gustducin

Biochemical and genetic studies have implicated α-gustducin as a key component in the transduction of both bitter or sweet taste. Yet, α-gustducin-null mice are not completely unresponsive to bitter or sweet compounds. To gain insights into how gustducin mediates responses to bitter and sweet compounds, and to elicit the nature of the gustducin-independent pathways, we generated a dominant-negative form of α-gustducin and expressed it as a transgene from the α-gustducin promoter in both wild-type and α-gustducin-null mice. A single mutation, G352P, introduced into the C-terminal region of α-gustducin critical for receptor interaction rendered the mutant protein unresponsive to activation by taste receptor, but left its other functions intact. In control experiments, expression of wild-type α-gustducin as a transgene in α-gustducin-null mice fully restored responsiveness to bitter and sweet compounds, formally proving that the targeted deletion of the α-gustducin gene caused the taste deficits of the null mice. In contrast, transgenic expression of the G352P mutant did not restore responsiveness of the null mice to either bitter or sweet compounds. Furthermore, in the wild-type background, the mutant transgene inhibited endogenous α-gustducin's interactions with taste receptors, i.e., it acted as a dominant-negative. That the mutant transgene further diminished the residual bitter and sweet taste responsiveness of the α-gustducin-null mice suggests that other guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins expressed in the α-gustducin lineage of taste cells mediate these responses.

How are close residues of protein structures distributed in primary sequence?

Structurally neighboring residues are categorized according to their separation in the primary sequence as proximal (1-4 positions apart) and otherwise distal, which in turn is divided into near (5-20 positions), far (21-50 positions), very far ( > 50 positions), and interchain (from different chains of the same structure). These categories describe the linear distance histogram (LDH) for three-dimensional neighboring residue types. Among the main results are the following: (i) nearest-neighbor hydrophobic residues tend to be increasingly distally separated in the linear sequence, thus most often connecting distinct secondary structure units. (ii) The LDHs of oppositely charged nearest-neighbors emphasize proximal positions with a subsidiary maximum for very far positions. (iii) Cysteine-cysteine structural interactions rarely involve proximal positions. (iv) The greatest numbers of interchain specific nearest-neighbors in protein structures are composed of oppositely charged residues. (v) The largest fraction of side-chain neighboring residues from beta-strands involves near positions, emphasizing associations between consecutive strands. (vi) Exposed residue pairs are predominantly located in proximal linear positions, while buried residue pairs principally correspond to far or very far distal positions. The results are principally invariant to protein sizes, amino acid usages, linear distance normalizations, and over- and underrepresentations among nearest-neighbor types. Interpretations and hypotheses concerning the LDHs, particularly those of hydrophobic and charged pairings, are discussed with respect to protein stability and functionality. The pronounced occurrence of oppositely charged interchain contacts is consistent with many observations on protein complexes where multichain stabilization is facilitated by electrostatic interactions.