UV-induced inhibition of transcription involves repression of transcription initiation and phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II

Cells from patients with Cockayne syndrome (CS) are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents and are unable to restore damage-inhibited RNA synthesis. On the basis of repair kinetics of different types of lesions in transcriptionally active genes, we hypothesized previously that impaired transcription in CS cells is a consequence of defective transcription initiation after DNA damage induction. Here, we investigated the effect of UV irradiation on transcription by using an in vitro transcription system that allowed uncoupling of initiation from elongation events. Nuclear extracts prepared from UV-irradiated or mock-treated normal human and CS cells were assayed for transcription activity on an undamaged β-globin template. Transcription activity in nuclear extracts closely mimicked kinetics of transcription in intact cells: extracts from normal cells prepared 1 h after UV exposure showed a strongly reduced activity, whereas transcription activity was fully restored in extracts prepared 6 h after treatment. Extracts from CS cells exhibited reduced transcription activity at any time after UV exposure. Reduced transcription activity in extracts coincided with a strong reduction of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) containing hypophosphorylated C-terminal domain, the form of RNAPII known to be recruited to the initiation complex. These results suggest that inhibition of transcription after UV irradiation is at least partially caused by repression of transcription initiation and not solely by blocked elongation at sites of lesions. Generation of hypophosphorylated RNAPII after DNA damage appears to play a crucial role in restoration of transcription. CS proteins may be required for this process in a yet unknown way.

The CuA center of cytochrome-c oxidase: electronic structure and spectra of models compared to the properties of CuA domains.

The electronic structure and spectrum of several models of the binuclear metal site in soluble CuA domains of cytochrome-c oxidase have been calculated by the use of an extended version of the complete neglect of differential overlap/spectroscopic method. The experimental spectra have two strong transitions of nearly equal intensity around 500 nm and a near-IR transition close to 800 nm. The model that best reproduces these features consists of a dimer of two blue (type 1) copper centers, in which each Cu atom replaces the missing imidazole on the other Cu atom. Thus, both Cu atoms have one cysteine sulfur atom and one imidazole nitrogen atom as ligands, and there are no bridging ligands but a direct Cu-Cu bond. According to the calculations, the two strong bands in the visible region originate from exciton coupling of the dipoles of the two copper monomers, and the near-IR band is a charge-transfer transition between the two Cu atoms. The known amino acid sequence has been used to construct a molecular model of the CuA site by the use of a template and energy minimization. In this model, the two ligand cysteine residues are in one turn of an alpha-helix, whereas one ligand histidine is in a loop following this helix and the other one is in a beta-strand.

Excitation–contraction coupling is unaffected by drastic alteration of the sequence surrounding residues L720–L764 of the α1S II-III loop

The II-III loop of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) α1S subunit is responsible for bidirectional-signaling interactions with the ryanodine receptor (RyR1): transmitting an orthograde, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling signal to RyR1 and receiving a retrograde, current-enhancing signal from RyR1. Previously, several reports argued for the importance of two distinct regions of the skeletal II-III loop (residues R681–L690 and residues L720–Q765, respectively), claiming for each a key function in DHPR–RyR1 communication. To address whether residues 720–765 of the II-III loop are sufficient to enable skeletal-type (Ca2+ entry-independent) EC coupling and retrograde interaction with RyR1, we constructed a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged chimera (GFP-SkLM) having rabbit skeletal (Sk) DHPR sequence except for a II-III loop (L) from the DHPR of the house fly, Musca domestica (M). The Musca II-III loop (75% dissimilarity to α1S) has no similarity to α1S in the regions R681–L690 and L720–Q765. GFP-SkLM expressed in dysgenic myotubes (which lack endogenous α1S subunits) was unable to restore EC coupling and displayed strongly reduced Ca2+ current densities despite normal surface expression levels and correct triad targeting (colocalization with RyR1). Introducing rabbit α1S residues L720–L764 into the Musca II-III loop of GFP-SkLM (substitution for Musca DHPR residues E724–T755) completely restored bidirectional coupling, indicating its dependence on α1S loop residues 720–764 but its independence from other regions of the loop. Thus, 45 α1S-residues embedded in a very dissimilar background are sufficient to restore bidirectional coupling, indicating that these residues may be a site of a protein–protein interaction required for bidirectional coupling.