Protective anti-tumor immunity induced by vaccination with recombinant adenoviruses encoding multiple tumor-associated cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes in a string-of-beads fashion

Vaccines harboring genes that encode functional oncoproteins are intrinsically hazardous, as their application may lead to introduction of these genes into normal cells and thereby to tumorigenesis. On the other hand, oncoproteins are especially attractive targets for immunotherapy of cancer, as their expression is generally required for tumor growth, making the arisal of tumor variants lacking these antigens unlikely. Using murine tumor models, we investigated the efficacy of polyepitope recombinant adenovirus (rAd) vaccines, which encode only the immunogenic T cell epitopes derived from several oncogenes, for the induction of protective anti-tumor immunity. We chose to employ rAd, as these are safe vectors that do not induce the side effects associated with, for example, vaccinia virus vaccines. A single polyepitope rAd was shown to give rise to presentation of both H-2 and human leukocyte antigen-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes. Moreover, vaccination with a rAd encoding H-2-restricted CTL epitopes, derived from human adenovirus type 5 early region 1 and human papilloma virus type 16-induced tumors, elicited strong tumor-reactive CTL and protected the vaccinated animals against an otherwise lethal challenge with either of these tumors. The protection induced was superior compared with that obtained by vaccination with irradiated tumor cells. Thus, vaccination with polyepitope rAd is a powerful approach for the induction of protective anti-tumor immunity that allows simultaneous immunization against multiple tumor-associated T cell epitopes, restricted by various major histocompatibility complex haplotypes.

GAIP is membrane-anchored by palmitoylation and interacts with the activated (GTP-bound) form of Gαi subunits

GAIP (G Alpha Interacting Protein) is a member of the recently described RGS (Regulators of G-protein Signaling) family that was isolated by interaction cloning with the heterotrimeric G-protein Gαi3 and was recently shown to be a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). In AtT-20 cells stably expressing GAIP, we found that GAIP is membrane-anchored and faces the cytoplasm, because it was not released by sodium carbonate treatment but was digested by proteinase K. When Cos cells were transiently transfected with GAIP and metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine, two pools of GAIP—a soluble and a membrane-anchored pool—were found. Since the N terminus of GAIP contains a cysteine string motif and cysteine string proteins are heavily palmitoylated, we investigated the possibility that membrane-anchored GAIP might be palmitoylated. We found that after labeling with [3H]palmitic acid, the membrane-anchored pool but not the soluble pool was palmitoylated. In the yeast two-hybrid system, GAIP was found to interact specifically with members of the Gαi subfamily, Gαi1, Gαi2, Gαi3, Gαz, and Gαo, but not with members of other Gα subfamilies, Gαs, Gαq, and Gα12/13. The C terminus of Gαi3 is important for binding because a 10-aa C-terminal truncation and a point mutant of Gαi3 showed significantly diminished interaction. GAIP interacted preferentially with the activated (GTP) form of Gαi3, which is in keeping with its GAP activity. We conclude that GAIP is a membrane-anchored GAP with a cysteine string motif. This motif, present in cysteine string proteins found on synaptic vesicles, pancreatic zymogen granules, and chromaffin granules, suggests GAIP’s possible involvement in membrane trafficking.

On the mechanism of skin wound "contraction": a granulation tissue "knockout" with a normal phenotype.

This report explores the mechanism of spontaneous closure of full-thickness skin wounds. The domestic pig, often used as a human analogue for skin wound repair studies, closes these wounds with kinetics similar to those in the guinea pig (mobile skin), even though the porcine dermis on the back is thick and nearly immobile. In the domestic pig, as in the guinea pig, daily full-thickness excisions of the central granulation tissue up to but not including the wound edges in both back and flank wounds do not alter the rate or completeness of wound closure or the final pattern of the scar. A purse-string mechanism of closure was precluded by showing that surgical interruption of wound edge continuity does not alter closure kinetics or wound shape. We conclude that "tightness" of skin is not a key factor nor is the central granulation tissue required for normal wound closure. These data imply that in vitro models such as contraction of isolated granulation tissue or of the cell-populated collagen lattice may not be relevant for understanding the cell biology of in vivo wound closure. Implications for the mechanism for wound closure are discussed.