β-Neuregulin-1 is required for the in vivo development of functional Ca2+-activated K+ channels in parasympathetic neurons

The development of functional Ca2+-activated K+ channels (KCa) in chick ciliary ganglion (CG) neurons requires interactions with afferent preganglionic nerve terminals. Here we show that the essential preganglionic differentiation factor is an isoform of β-neuregulin-1. β-Neuregulin-1 transcripts are expressed in the midbrain preganglionic Edinger–Westphal nucleus at developmental stages that coincide with or precede the normal onset of macroscopic KCa in CG neurons. Injection of β-neuregulin-1 peptide into the brains of developing embryos evoked a robust stimulation of functional KCa channels at stages before the normal appearance of these channels in CG neurons developing in vivo. Conversely, injection of a neutralizing antiserum specific for β-neuregulin-1 inhibited the development of KCa channels in CG neurons. Low concentrations of β-neuregulin-1 evoked a robust increase in whole-cell KCa in CG neurons cocultured with iris target tissues. By contrast, culturing CG neurons with iris cells or low concentrations of β-neuregulin-1 by themselves was insufficient to stimulate KCa. These data suggest that the preganglionic factor required for the development of KCa in ciliary ganglion neurons is an isoform of β-neuregulin-1, and that this factor acts in concert with target-derived trophic molecules to regulate the differentiation of excitability.

Notch signaling in the development of the inner ear: Lessons from Drosophila

The sensory patches in the ear of a vertebrate can be compared with the mechanosensory bristles of a fly. This comparison has led to the discovery that lateral inhibition mediated by the Notch cell–cell signaling pathway, first characterized in Drosophila and crucial for bristle development, also has a key role in controlling the pattern of sensory hair cells and supporting cells in the ear. We review the arguments for considering the sensory patches of the vertebrate ear and bristles of the insect to be homologous structures, evolved from a common ancestral mechanosensory organ, and we examine more closely the role of Notch signaling in each system. Using viral vectors to misexpress components of the Notch pathway in the chick ear, we show that a simple lateral-inhibition model based on feedback regulation of the Notch ligand Delta is inadequate for the ear just as it is for the fly bristle. The Notch ligand Serrate1, expressed in supporting cells in the ear, is regulated by lateral induction, not lateral inhibition; commitment to become a hair cell is not simply controlled by levels of expression of the Notch ligands Delta1, Serrate1, and Serrate2 in the neighbors of the nascent hair cell; and at least one factor, Numb, capable of blocking reception of lateral inhibition is concentrated in hair cells. These findings reinforce the parallels between the vertebrate ear and the fly bristle and show how study of the insect system can help us understand the vertebrate.