B7–CTLA4 interaction enhances both production of antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes and resistance to tumor challenge

Expression of B7-family costimulatory molecules CD80 (B7–1) and CD86 (B7–2) on tumor cells enhances host immunity. However, the role of the two B7 receptors, CD28 and CTLA4 (CD152), on T cells in antitumor immune response has not been clearly elucidated. Based on the effects of anti-CD28 and anti-CTLA4 mAbs on T cell response, it was proposed that CD28-B7 interaction promotes antitumor immunity, whereas B7-CTLA4 interaction down-regulates it. A critical test for the hypothesis is whether selective engagement of CTLA4 receptors by their natural ligands CD80 and CD86 enhances or reduces antitumor immunity. Here we used tumors expressing wild-type and mutant CD80, as well as mice with targeted mutation of CD28, to address this issue. We report that in syngeneic wild-type mice, B7W (W88>A), a CD80 mutant that has lost binding to CD28 but retained binding to CTLA4, can enhance the induction of antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL); B7Y (Y201>A), which binds neither CD28 nor CTLA4, fails to do so. Consistent with these observations, B7W-transfected J558 plasmocytoma and EL4 thymoma grow significantly more slowly than those transfected with either vector alone or with B7Y. Optimal tumor rejection requires wild-type CD80. Moreover, expression of a high level of CD80 on thymoma EL4 cells conveys immunity in mice with a targeted mutation of CD28 gene. Taken together, our results demonstrate that B7-CTLA4 interaction enhances production of antitumor CTL and resistance to tumor challenge and that optimal enhancement of antitumor immunity by CD80 requires its engagement of both CD28 and CTLA4.

A quantitative test to estimate neutralizing antibodies to the hepatitis C virus: cytofluorimetric assessment of envelope glycoprotein 2 binding to target cells.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of chronic hepatitis. The virus does not replicate efficiently in cell cultures, and it is therefore difficult to assess infection-neutralizing antibodies and to evaluate protective immunity in vitro. To study the binding of the HCV envelope to cell-surface receptors, we developed an assay to assess specific binding of recombinant envelope proteins to human cells and neutralization thereof. HCV recombinant envelope proteins expressed in various systems were incubated with human cells, and binding was assessed by flow cytometry using anti-envelope antibodies. Envelope glycoprotein 2 (E2) expressed in mammalian cells, but not in yeast or insect cells, binds human cells with high affinity (Kd approximately 10(-8) M). We then assessed antibodies able to neutralize E2 binding in the sera of both vaccinated and carrier chimpanzees, as well as in the sera of humans infected with various HCV genotypes. Vaccination with recombinant envelope proteins expressed in mammalian cells elicited high titers of neutralizing antibodies that correlated with protection from HCV challenge. HCV infection does not elicit neutralizing antibodies in most chimpanzees and humans, although low titers of neutralizing antibodies were detectable in a minority of infections. The ability to neutralize binding of E2 derived from the HCV-1 genotype was equally distributed among sera from patients infected with HCV genotypes 1, 2, and 3, demonstrating that binding of E2 is partly independent of E2 hypervariable regions. However, a mouse monoclonal antibody raised against the E2 hypervariable region 1 can partially neutralize binding of E2, indicating that at least two neutralizing epitopes, one of which is hypervariable, should exist on the E2 protein. The neutralization-of-binding assay described will be useful to study protective immunity to HCV infection and for vaccine development.