The current biodiversity extinction event: Scenarios for mitigation and recovery

The current massive degradation of habitat and extinction of species is taking place on a catastrophically short timescale, and their effects will fundamentally reset the future evolution of the planet's biota. The fossil record suggests that recovery of global ecosystems has required millions or even tens of millions of years. Thus, intervention by humans, the very agents of the current environmental crisis, is required for any possibility of short-term recovery or maintenance of the biota. Many current recovery efforts have deficiencies, including insufficient information on the diversity and distribution of species, ecological processes, and magnitude and interaction of threats to biodiversity (pollution, overharvesting, climate change, disruption of biogeochemical cycles, introduced or invasive species, habitat loss and fragmentation through land use, disruption of community structure in habitats, and others). A much greater and more urgently applied investment to address these deficiencies is obviously warranted. Conservation and restoration in human-dominated ecosystems must strengthen connections between human activities, such as agricultural or harvesting practices, and relevant research generated in the biological, earth, and atmospheric sciences. Certain threats to biodiversity require intensive international cooperation and input from the scientific community to mitigate their harmful effects, including climate change and alteration of global biogeochemical cycles. In a world already transformed by human activity, the connection between humans and the ecosystems they depend on must frame any strategy for the recovery of the biota.

GTP-binding protein βγ subunits mediate presynaptic calcium current inhibition by GABAB receptor

A variety of GTP-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors are expressed at the nerve terminals of central synapses and play modulatory roles in transmitter release. At the calyx of Held, a rat auditory brainstem synapse, activation of presynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptors (GABAB receptors) or metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibits presynaptic P/Q-type Ca2+ channel currents via activation of G proteins, thereby attenuating transmitter release. To identify the heterotrimeric G protein subunits involved in this presynaptic inhibition, we loaded G protein βγ subunits (Gβγ) directly into the calyceal nerve terminal through whole-cell patch pipettes. Gβγ slowed the activation of presynaptic Ca2+ currents (IpCa) and attenuated its amplitude in a manner similar to the externally applied baclofen, a GABAB receptor agonist. The effects of both Gβγ and baclofen were relieved after strong depolarization of the nerve terminal. In addition, Gβγ partially occluded the inhibitory effect of baclofen on IpCa. In contrast, guanosine 5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate)-bound Goα loaded into the calyx had no effect. Immunocytochemical examination revealed that the subtype of G proteins Go, but not the Gi, subtype, is expressed in the calyceal nerve terminal. These results suggest that presynaptic inhibition mediated by G protein-coupled receptors occurs primarily by means of the direct interaction of Go βγ subunits with presynaptic Ca2+ channels.