The orientation of the AP-1 heterodimer on DNA strongly affects transcriptional potency

Activation of gene transcription in eukaryotes requires the cooperative assembly of an initiation complex containing many protein subunits. The necessity that these components contact each other and the promoter/enhancer in defined ways suggests that their spatial arrangement might influence the activation response. Indeed, growing evidence indicates that DNA architecture can profoundly affect transcriptional potency. Much less is known about the influence of protein architecture on transcriptional activation. Here, we examine the architectural dependence of activator function through the analysis of matched pairs of AP-1•DNA complexes differing only in their orientation. Mutation of a critical Arg residue in the basic-leucine zipper domain of either Fos or Jun yielded single point-mutant heterodimers that bind DNA in a single defined orientation, as determined directly by native chemical ligation/affinity cleavage; by contrast, the corresponding wild-type protein binds DNA as a roughly equal mixture of two isomeric orientations, which are related by subunit interchange. The stereochemistry of the point-mutant heterodimers could be switched by inversion of a C•G base pair in the center of the AP-1 site, thus providing access to both fixed orientational isomers. Yeast reporter gene assays consistently revealed that one orientational isomer activates transcription at least 10-fold more strongly than the other. These results suggest that protein architecture, especially the spatial relationship of the activation domain to the promoter, can exert a powerful influence on activator potency.

Using electroactive substrates to pattern the attachment of two different cell populations

This report describes the development of an electroactive mask that permits the patterning of two different cell populations to a single substrate. This mask is based on a self-assembled monolayer of alkanethiolates on gold that could be switched from a state that prevents the attachment of cells to a state that promotes the integrin-mediated attachment of cells. Monolayers were patterned into regions having this electroactive monolayer and a second set of regions that were adhesive. After Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts had attached to the adhesive regions of this substrate, the second set of regions was activated electrically to permit the attachment of a second population of fibroblast cells. This method provides a general strategy for patterning the attachment of multiple cell types and will be important for studying heterotypic cell-cell interactions.

Crystal structure of the SarR protein from Staphylococcus aureus

The expression of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus is controlled by global regulatory loci (e.g., sarA and agr). The sar (Staphylococcus accessory regulator) locus is composed of three overlapping transcripts (sarA P1, P3, and P2, transcripts initiated from the P1, P3, and P2 promoters, respectively), all encoding the 124-aa SarA protein. The level of SarA, the major regulatory protein, is partially controlled by the differential activation of the sarA promoters. We previously partially purified a 13.6-kDa protein, designated SarR, that binds to the sarA promoter region to down-modulate sarA transcription from the P1 promoter and subsequently SarA expression. SarR shares sequence similarity to SarA, and another SarA homolog, SarS. Here we report the 2.3 Å-resolution x-ray crystal structure of the dimeric SarR-MBP (maltose binding protein) fusion protein. The structure reveals that the SarR protein not only has a classic helix–turn–helix module for DNA binding at the major grooves, but also has an additional loop region involved in DNA recognition at the minor grooves. This interaction mode could represent a new functional class of the “winged helix” family. The dimeric SarR structure could accommodate an unusually long stretch of ≈27 nucleotides with two or four bending points along the course, which could lead to the bending of DNA by 90° or more, similar to that seen in the catabolite activator protein (CAP)–DNA complex. The structure also demonstrates the molecular basis for the stable dimerization of the SarR monomers and possible motifs for interaction with other proteins.