An autologous oral DNA vaccine protects against murine melanoma

We demonstrated that peripheral T cell tolerance toward murine melanoma self-antigens gp100 and TRP-2 can be broken by an autologous oral DNA vaccine containing the murine ubiquitin gene fused to minigenes encoding peptide epitopes gp10025–33 and TRP-2181–188. These epitopes contain dominant anchor residues for MHC class I antigen alleles H-2Db and H-2Kb, respectively. The DNA vaccine was delivered by oral gavage by using an attenuated strain of Salmonella typhimurium as carrier. Tumor-protective immunity was mediated by MHC class I antigen-restricted CD8+ T cells that secreted TH1 cytokine IFN-γ and induced tumor rejection and growth suppression after a lethal challenge with B16G3.26 murine melanoma cells. Importantly, the protective immunity induced by this autologous DNA vaccine against murine melanoma cells was at least equal to that achieved through xenoimmunization with the human gp10025–33 peptide, which differs in its three NH2-terminal amino acid residues from its murine counterpart and was previously reported to be clearly superior to an autologous vaccine in inducing protective immunity. The presence of ubiquitin upstream of the minigene proved to be essential for achieving this tumor-protective immunity, suggesting that effective antigen processing and presentation may make it possible to break peripheral T cell tolerance to a self-antigen. This vaccine design might prove useful for future rational designs of other recombinant DNA vaccines targeting tissue differentiation antigens expressed by tumors.

Immune surveillance against a solid tumor fails because of immunological ignorance

Many peripheral solid tumors such as sarcomas and carcinomas express tumor-specific antigens that can serve as targets for immune effector T cells. Nevertheless, overall immune surveillance against such tumors seems relatively inefficient. We studied immune surveillance against a s.c. sarcoma expressing a characterized viral tumor antigen. Surprisingly, the tumor cells were capable of inducing a protective cytotoxic T cell response if transferred as a single-cell suspension. However, if they were transplanted as small tumor pieces, tumors readily grew. Tumor growth correlated strictly with (i) failure of tumor cells to reach the draining lymph nodes and (ii) absence of primed cytotoxic T cells. Cytotoxic T cells were not tolerant or deleted because a tumor antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell response was readily induced in lymphoid tissue by immunization with virus or with tumor cells even in the presence of large tumors. Established tumors were rejected by vaccine-induced effector T cells if effector T cells were maintained by prolonged or repetitive vaccination, but not by single-dose vaccination. Thus, in addition to several other tumor-promoting parameters, some antigenic peripheral sarcomas—and probably carcinomas—may grow not because they anergize or tolerize tumor-specific T cells, but because such tumors are immunologically dealt with as if they were in a so-called immunologically privileged site and are ignored for too long.

Converting enzyme-independent release of tumor necrosis factor α and IL-1β from a stimulated human monocytic cell line in the presence of activated neutrophils or purified proteinase 3

Two important cytokines mediating inflammation are tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and IL-1β, both of which require conversion to soluble forms by converting enzymes. The importance of TNFα-converting enzyme and IL-1β-converting enzyme in the production of circulating TNFα and IL-1β in response to systemic challenges has been demonstrated by the use of specific converting enzyme inhibitors. Many inflammatory responses, however, are not systemic but instead are localized. In these situations release and/or activation of cytokines may be different from that seen in response to a systemic stimulus, particularly because associations of various cell populations in these foci allows for the exposure of procytokines to the proteolytic enzymes produced by activated neutrophils, neutrophil elastase (NE), proteinase 3 (PR3), and cathepsin G (Cat G). To investigate the possibility of alternative processing of TNFα and/or IL-1β by neutrophil-derived proteinases, immunoreactive TNFα and IL-1β release from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated THP-1 cells was measured in the presence of activated human neutrophils. Under these conditions, TNFα and IL-1β release was augmented 2- to 5-fold. In the presence of a specific inhibitor of NE and PR3, enhanced release of both cytokines was largely abolished; however, in the presence of a NE and Cat G selective inhibitor, secretory leucocyte proteinase inhibitor, reduction of the enhanced release was minimal. This finding suggested that the augmented release was attributable to PR3 but not NE nor Cat G. Use of purified enzymes confirmed this conclusion. These results indicate that there may be alternative pathways for the production of these two proinflammatory cytokines, particularly in the context of local inflammatory processes.