Cell-cell communication regulates the effects of protein aspartate phosphatases on the phosphorelay controlling development in Bacillus subtilis.

Rap phosphatases are a recently discovered family of protein aspartate phosphatases that dephosphorylate the Spo0F--P intermediate of the phosphorelay, thus preventing sporulation of Bacillus subtilis. They are regulators induced by physiological processes that are antithetical to sporulation. The RapA phosphatase is induced by the ComP-ComA two-component signal transduction system responsible for initiating competence. RapA phosphatase activity was found to be controlled by a small protein, PhrA, encoded on the same transcript as RapA. PhrA resembles secreted proteins and the evidence suggests that it is cleaved by signal peptidase I and a 19-residue C-terminal domain is secreted from the cell. The sporulation deficiency caused by the uncontrolled RapA activity of a phrA mutant can be complemented by synthetic peptides comprising the last six or more of the C-terminal residues of PhrA. Whether the peptide controls RapA activity directly or by regulating its synthesis remains to be determined. Complementation of the phrA mutant can also be obtained in mixed cultures with a wild-type strain, suggesting the peptide may serve as a means of communication between cells. Importation of the secreted peptide required the oligopeptide transport system. The sporulation deficiency of oligopeptide transport mutants can be suppressed by mutating the rapA and rapB genes or by introduction of a spo0F mutation Y13S that renders the protein insensitive to Rap phosphatases. The data indicate that the sporulation deficiency of oligopeptide transport mutants is due to their inability to import the peptides controlling Rap phosphatases.

UME6 is a central component of a developmental regulatory switch controlling meiosis-specific gene expression.

The UME6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was identified as a mitotic repressor of early meiosis-specific gene expression. It encodes a Zn2Cys6 DNA-binding protein which binds to URS1, a promoter element needed for both mitotic repression and meiotic induction of early meiotic genes. This paper demonstrates that a complete deletion of UME6 causes not only vegetative derepression of early meiotic genes during vegetative growth but also a significant reduction in induction of meiosis-specific genes, accompanied by a severe defect in meiotic progression. After initiating premeiotic DNA synthesis the vast majority of cells (approximately 85%) become arrested in prophase and fail to execute recombination; a minority of cells (approximately 15%) complete recombination and meiosis I, and half of these form asci. Quantitative analysis of the same early meiotic transcripts that are vegetatively derepressed in the ume6 mutant, SPO11, SPO13, IME2, and SPO1, indicates a low level of induction in meiosis above their vegetative derepressed levels. In addition, the expression of later meiotic transcripts, SPS2 and DIT1, is significantly delayed and reduced. The expression pattern of early meiotic genes in ume6-deleted cells is strikingly similar to that of early meiotic genes with promoter mutations in URS1. These results support the view that UME6 and URS1 are part of a developmental switch that controls both vegetative repression and meiotic induction of meiosis-specific genes.

Structural features of the invariant chain fragment CLIP controlling rapid release from HLA-DR molecules and inhibition of peptide binding.

The invariant chain (Ii) prevents binding of ligands to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum and during intracellular transport. Stepwise removal of the Ii in a trans-Golgi compartment renders MHC class II molecules accessible for peptide loading, with CLIP (class II-associated Ii peptides) as the final fragment to be released. Here we show that CLIP can be subdivided into distinct functional regions. The C-terminal segment (residues 92-105) of the CLIP-(81-105) fragment mediates inhibition of self- and antigenic peptide binding to HLA-DR2 molecules. In contrast, the N-terminal segment CLIP-(81-98) binds to the Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B contact site outside the peptide-binding groove on the alpha 1 domain and does not interfere with peptide binding. Its functional significance appears to lie in the contribution to CLIP removal: the dissociation of CLIP-(81-105) is characterized by a fast off-rate, which is accelerated at endosomal pH, whereas in the absence of the N-terminal CLIP-(81-91), the off-rate of C-terminal CLIP-(92-105) is slow and remains unaltered at low pH. Mechanistically, the N-terminal segment of CLIP seems to prevent tight interactions of CLIP side chains with specificity pockets in the peptide-binding groove that normally occurs during maturation of long-lived class II-peptide complexes.

Multiple loci govern the bone marrow-derived immunoregulatory mechanism controlling dominant resistance to autoimmune orchitis.

The existence of immunoregulatory genes conferring dominant resistance to autoimmunity is well documented. In an effort to better understand the nature and mechanisms of action of these genes, we utilized the murine model of autoimmune orchitis as a prototype. When the orchitis-resistant strain DBA/2J is crossed with the orchitis-susceptible strain BALB/cByJ, the F1 hybrid is completely resistant to the disease. By using reciprocal radiation bone marrow chimeras, the functional component mediating this resistance was mapped to the bone marrow-derived compartment. Resistance is not a function of either low-dose irradiation- or cyclophosphamide (20 mg/kg)-sensitive immunoregulatory cells, but can be adoptively transferred by primed splenocytes. Genome exclusion mapping identified three loci controlling the resistant phenotype. Orch3 maps to chromosome 11, whereas Orch4 and Orch5 map to the telomeric and centromeric regions of chromosome 1, respectively. All three genes are linked to a number of immunologically relevant candidate loci. Most significant, however, is the linkage of Orch3 to Idd4 and Orch5 to Idd5, two susceptibility genes which play a role in autoimmune insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes mellitus in the nonobese diabetic mouse.

Aod1, the immunoregulatory locus controlling abrogation of tolerance in neonatal thymectomy-induced autoimmune ovarian dysgenesis, maps to mouse chromosome 16.

Mice thymectomized at three days of age (D3Tx) develop during adulthood a variety of organ-specific autoimmune diseases, including autoimmune ovarian dysgenesis (AOD). The phenotypic spectrum of AOD is characterized by the development of anti-ovarian autoantibodies, oophoritis, and atrophy. The D3Tx model of AOD is unique in that disease induction depends exclusively on perturbation of the normal developing immune system, is T-cell-mediated, and is strain specific. For example, D3Tx A/J mice are highly susceptible to AOD, whereas C57BL/6J mice are resistant. After D3Tx, self ovarian antigens, expressed at physiological levels, trigger an autoimmune response capable of eliciting disease. The D3Tx model provides, therefore, the opportunity to focus on the mechanisms of self-tolerance that are relevant to disease pathogenesis. Previous studies indicate that the principal mechanisms involved in AOD susceptibility are genetically controlled and govern developmental processes associated with the induction and maintenance of peripheral tolerance. We report here the mapping of the Aod1 locus to mouse chromosome 16 within a region encoding several loci of immunologic relevance, including scid, Igl1, VpreB, Igll, Igl1r, Mtv6 (Mls-3), Ly-7, Ifnar, and Ifgt.

Ecological chaos in the wake of invasion.

Irregularities in observed population densities have traditionally been attributed to discretization of the underlying dynamics. We propose an alternative explanation by demonstrating the evolution of spatiotemporal chaos in reaction-diffusion models for predator-prey interactions. The chaos is generated naturally in the wake of invasive waves of predators. We discuss in detail the mechanism by which the chaos is generated. By considering a mathematical caricature of the predator-prey models, we go on to explain the dynamical origin of the irregular behavior and to justify our assertion that the behavior we present is a genuine example of spatiotemporal chaos.