Competition between noggin and bone morphogenetic protein 4 activities may regulate dorsalization during Xenopus development.

Bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) induces ventral mesoderm but represses dorsal mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. We show that BMP-4 inhibits two signaling pathways regulating dorsal mesoderm formation, the induction of dorsal mesoderm (Spemann organizer) and the dorsalization of ventral mesoderm. Ectopic expression of BMP-4 RNA reduces goosecoid and forkhead-1 transcription in whole embryos and in activin-treated animal cap explants. Embryos and animal caps overexpressing BMP-4 transcribe high levels of genes expressed in ventral mesoderm (Xbra, Xwnt-8, Xpo, Mix.1, XMyoD). The Spemann organizer is ventralized in these embryos; abnormally high levels of Xwnt-8 mRNA and low levels of goosecoid mRNA are detected in the organizer. In addition, the organizer loses the ability to dorsalize neighboring ventral marginal zone to muscle. Overexpression of BMP-4 in ventral mesoderm inhibits its response to dorsalization signals. Ventral marginal zone explants ectopically expressing BMP-4 form less muscle when treated with soluble noggin protein or when juxtaposed to a normal Spemann organizer in comparison to control explants. Endogenous BMP-4 transcripts are downregulated in ventral marginal zone explants dorsalized by noggin, in contrast to untreated explants. Thus, while BMP-4 inhibits noggin protein activity, noggin downregulates BMP-4 expression by dorsalizing ventral marginal zone to muscle. Noggin and BMP-4 activities may control the lateral extent of dorsalization within the marginal zone. Competition between these two molecules may determine the final degree of muscle formation in the marginal zone, thus defining the border between dorsolateral and ventral mesoderm.

Restriction-modification systems as genomic parasites in competition for specific sequences.

Restriction-modification (RM) systems are believed to have evolved to protect cells from foreign DNA. However, this hypothesis may not be sufficient to explain the diversity and specificity in sequence recognition, as well as other properties, of these systems. We report that the EcoRI restriction endonuclease-modification methylase (rm) gene pair stabilizes plasmids that carry it and that this stabilization is blocked by an RM of the same sequence specificity (EcoRI or its isoschizomer, Rsr I) but not by an RM of a different specificity (PaeR7I) on another plasmid. The PaeR7I rm likewise stabilizes plasmids, unless an rm gene pair with identical sequence specificity is present. Our analysis supports the following model for stabilization and incompatibility: the descendants of cells that have lost an rm gene pair expose the recognition sites in their chromosomes to lethal attack by any remaining restriction enzymes unless modification by another RM system of the same specificity protects these sites. Competition for specific sequences among these selfish genes may have generated the great diversity and specificity in sequence recognition among RM systems. Such altruistic suicide strategies, similar to those found in virus-infected cells, may have allowed selfish RM systems to spread by effectively competing with other selfish genes.

Sex proportions of Haemoproteus blood parasites and local mate competition.

Recent genetic evidence suggests that parasitic protozoa often reproduce by "selfing," defined as sexual stages from a single, clonal lineage fertilizing each other. Selfing favors production of an excess of female over male progeny. We tested whether the proportion of male gametocytes of blood parasites of the genus Haemoproteus was affected by variables that could influence the probability of selfing. Proportions of male Haemoproteus gametocytes from 11 passerine host populations were not affected by the age of the parasites' avian hosts, date in season, sex of host, intensity of host's infection, or prevalence of parasites within host populations.

Identification of auxin-responsive elements of parB and their expression in apices of shoot and root.

Detailed analysis of transgenic tobaccos containing a series of chimeric parB promoter/beta-glucuronidase (GUS) gene constructs allowed us to define two auxin-responsive elements (AREs) of 48 bp and 95 bp (positions -210 to -163 and -374 to -280) in the parB promoter. The two AREs responded independently to physiological concentrations of auxin. Gel retardation assays revealed binding of nuclear protein(s) to the sequence conserved between ARE I and ARE II. The auxin responsiveness of the parB promoter did not mediate the pathway through the as-1 element and transcription factor ASF-1. AREs I and II were responsive to auxin at physiological concentrations, whereas as-1 responded only to higher concentrations of auxin which may be interpreted as stress, though as-1 had been reported to be a minimal ARE [Liu, X. & Lam, E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 668-675]. Histochemical staining of transgenic tobacco that contained a parB promoter/GUS construct demonstrated the expression of GUS activity in the shoot apex as well as in the root tips, suggesting the involvement of parB expression in meristematic activity or differentiation. The drastic change in auxin responsiveness in the transgenic plants between the 6th and 10th day after imbibition of seeds implies the development or the activation of auxin signal transduction systems during plant development.