1 resultado para portable analyzer
em Scielo Uruguai
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (15)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (11)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (15)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (7)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (20)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (37)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (109)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (29)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (18)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (79)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (2)
- Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear, Brazil - Carpe dIEN (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (14)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (88)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (154)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (24)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (18)
- University of Michigan (85)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
Context: Mobile applications support a set of user-interaction features that are independent of the application logic. Rotating the device, scrolling, or zooming are examples of such features. Some bugs in mobile applications can be attributed to user-interaction features. Objective: This paper proposes and evaluates a bug analyzer based on user-interaction features that uses digital image processing to find bugs. Method: Our bug analyzer detects bugs by comparing the similarity between images taken before and after a user-interaction. SURF, an interest point detector and descriptor, is used to compare the images. To evaluate the bug analyzer, we conducted a case study with 15 randomly selected mobile applications. First, we identified user-interaction bugs by manually testing the applications. Images were captured before and after applying each user-interaction feature. Then, image pairs were processed with SURF to obtain interest points, from which a similarity percentage was computed, to finally decide whether there was a bug. Results: We performed a total of 49 user-interaction feature tests. When manually testing the applications, 17 bugs were found, whereas when using image processing, 15 bugs were detected. Conclusions: 8 out of 15 mobile applications tested had bugs associated to user-interaction features. Our bug analyzer based on image processing was able to detect 88% (15 out of 17) of the user-interaction bugs found with manual testing.